A NON-SUBSIDING JOSTLING! The complexity derivable from how we live can be so multiplicitly rigid and not be truism of what may not render itself to d absolute ingenuity of understanding under d unmbrella of comprehension. Choosing where to live is usually out of calculation even when we are not a standby witness to dt anatomical structural forge and mechanical arrangement projected towards d definition of a self-being. However a natural positioning will not deter to give d apportioning platform of where our integrity stand in d wide expanse of continental earth but in which jostling for a space never deny d concept dt those who survive are branded as d survival of d fittest. D survival on d fittest on d heel of the subjugation of d weak by the strong. A theory ascribable to academic cognition bt whose manifestation is too dangerous to guarantee d survival of d weak in d mist of d strong and which has given d testimony in d demonstration of evidence dt d society of man right from d era immemorial has been whitewashed wt dt pillaging and d need by d strong to make headlong watchword to plunder to annihilate, to exterminate with unabated accumulation of arsenal for fierce intimidation too unaissailably strong to be dislodged even before d taste of of d sharp edge of sword in d blanket-spread of juggernault and avid frenzied diametrically purported ego of crowned empror of oppressors under d title of vain glory and cumulative empowerment which d standing of such intergrity will either be condemned or wet d appetitie of elements dt constitiute record of history in d court of public opinion. D theory marks our society. Birth gives d open way to a location and even inspite of what must be needed for survival, are we not still having d stronger cornering it all for self- enrichment? D space it to expanded to allow d jostling to subside. D tenacity to live has set d pace dt a group of d most vulnerable must not give up even if d theory of communism will showcase d direction of societal rapproachment were leadership impractically has no endorsement. We live too strongly to make it bt too dangerously to mute those dt will still be ready to acquiesce in d demand of how we need to have it all in d theory of how it belongs to us all.
Posted on: Sun, 04 Aug 2013 14:26:33 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015