And I guess I have a question about the weird backlash to our trying to vet the Moncton Story (and we should also try ot vet the Adelaide story. Does anyone know how it ended?) My question for all those who attacked me/us for checking the story was: why? Why is it so very upsetting to simply question, when we have so much evidence by now of news stories that just do not check out as originally reported? You may not want to join in but what is your theoretical basis of opposition? I am sincerely curious. I was raised to believe that asking sincere questions is never wrong.
Posted on: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 19:23:45 +0000