Beautiful :).... Irish Weather Online (fergalt) responded to my video entitled Irish Weather Online - New World Order Collaborators. You will have to view the video to see that this is more lies and propaganda from the dying mainstream, yet he calls me the liar and accuses me of omitting scientific content from the video when one of the first things I said to the viewer was that they would have to read the article for themselves as it would have taken me hours to dissect it in its entirety. The focus of the video was not to waste the viewers time and bewilder them with your false contrail science Fergal (which I explained correctly in a few seconds), it was to point out that your deceptive little article is an affront to innocence and common sense and to let the viewer see for themselves the insidious NWO operative you truly are. So the questions still remains, are you going to come out of your little rathole and come on radio with me for a discussion ? ...............................................................>>>>>> fergalt May 17, 2014 at 10:07 pm So, here is the latest member of society to get sucked into the chemtrail conspiracy. He has decided not to comment directly on this page but has instead posted a video on his Youtube channel “Fluoride Free Wexford”, or “Wexford Skywatch”…I’m not quite sure. His name is Terry Lawton, from Wexford, and sees himself as somewhat of a preacher against what he calls the geo-engineering problem. A view of his channels and online presence will give a good impression of what we’re dealing with here. So, here is his video. It’s 23 minutes long, and I’m afraid they are 23 minutes of your life that you will not get back. I apologise in advance. But please read again my article, then listen to his twisted version of it, complete with misquotes, ommissions, and just plain lies. He has admitted himself (Portsmouth 2013) that he “is not a scientist or metororologist…just a plain observer from the ground”. He also stated on radio in 2012 that, until a friend mentioned chemtrails to him in 2009, he hadn’t even noticed anything going on in the sky, yet he makes out that it started happening in the mid ’90s. Hmmm… So, taking his points in chronological order: - Banning from the Facebook page: Yes, we do not allow conspiracy theories of any kind, including chemtrails, to clog the timelines of our 52,000+ Facebook users, but as stated here, they are free to post their comments on this article for all to view. He has chosen not to this. - Normal skies: Yes, they are normal photos of contrails. In the mid ’90s we didn’t have digital cameras and Google to allow people find images of anything in a fraction of a second. Five years ago, however, we did have them, but you still hadn’t noticed anything going on. Strange that, if you say it’s been going on since the ’90s. - LIE-ALERT: At 3:25 he says “Fergal is saying that cloud-seeding from aircraft does not exist…it only takes place from land-based facilities”. A total lie. I have no idea where he got this from, but he reckoned if he threw it in early then it might sway the reader’s view away from mine. Here’s what I actually said: “I am not denying that geo-engineering, still just a theoretical exercise, could be easy enough to try out, given the right modifications to an appropriate aircraft, or that cloud-seeding experiments have been carried out (but these only consist of silver iodide crystals from burning flares and not actual dumping of material). I am actually totally against the whole idea of trying to geo-engineer our way out of what is really not a problem, in my opinion.” So where did I say that cloud-seeding is only land-based and not from aircraft? I didn’t. He made it up. He lied. He then goes on with the smoke-screen (excuse the pun) of some videos of such cloud-seeding experiments and patents and articles relating to geo-engineering, hoping that the viewer is as gullible as he is and will believe that these are proof that Ryanair and Aer Lingus are spraying us today. There are literally millions of patents out there for everything you can imagine, most of which are never granted. A patent or a theoretical research paper is not proof that what is in it them is underway now. Nor is an article from Food Freedom News purporting that the IPCC are carrying out geo-engineering. Please quote original sources, not another conspirator. The IPCC speak of Solar Radiation Management (SRM), which is the long-term removal of CO2 through the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, but the genius author has conveniently switched this to mean geo-engineering through chemtrails, again hoping that no-one will notice. Terry didn’t notice – or at least pretended not to – and hoped you wouldn’t either. He then goes on to show a WMO article on weather modification (which, you’ll remember, I stated does take place in the form of cloud-seeding) and the list of countries that are active in this. Notice that they are all either rain-enhancement or hail-suppression applications, all through cloud-seeding. He wants you not to notice this and to think that it’s to do with high-altitude spraying from airliners. No one will fall for that, Terry, sorry. Oh, and the WMO are not my bosses. Neither are RTE. My full name and occupation are listed on the website for all to see. I am not a professional meteorologist. You made that up too. - Conspiracy Claim 1, on contrail duration: Well, I’m not quite sure – and I don’t think he is either – of what he’s trying to say here. He tries to come up with some scientific evidence to rubbish mine, but he basically stumbles around with some figure of -50 °C and 20 seconds. He states that it is a “scientific impossibility” for contrails to last more than 20 seconds…ever. He is totally wrong, but again hopes the viewer will swallow it without reading my referenced scientific facts. - He then shows a plane with just one engine producing a contrail. Yep, very possible, Terry. When conditions are right on the limit for contrail-formation, subtle differences in engine thrust (and hence exhaust-gas temperature) can flip the balance between a contrail forming and not. It could also be an aerodynamic contrail from a cross-wind or through the loss of say an engine panel, which has happened on several occasions. Again, we’re talking about conditions right on the limit, so small things make big differences. - He then shows videos of fuel-dump nozzles doing just that – dumping fuel – and tries to claim that they’re something else. Nope, Terry, they’re just fuel-dump nozzles, present on some aircraft to allow fuel (weight) to be dumped if an emergency landing is required. Look it up, if you dare. The 4th clip is an aerodynamic contrail from the wake vortex off the edge of the flap on a humid day. Look that up too. - Now, the best bit. Notice how he conveniently jumps to Claim 4, skipping out Claims 2 and 3. These obviously contain too much sound science for him to accept. He hopes that the viewer is stupid enough not to actually read my article, but accept him at face-value. If the viewer actually reads 2 and 3 they might actually learn something that will expose him for what he is. No, we can’t be having that. - Claim 4: Terry, if you had been good enough to actually go through Claims 2 and 3 then you would have found the answer to why contrails can be short and intermittent. The plane in the video is either throttling down to descend, or is descending down out of a humid later, or both. It’s very simple, and all explained in the parts that you chose to leave out. Now we see why you did. Oh, and about the “4 months of sunshine, not needing to look at a forecast at all” when you were younger; I assume you have climatological data to back that up. Rosslare was, until recently, a fully-manned synoptic meteorological station, with daily sunshine figures, so if you have some data to show such an abrupt change in summer conditions there then please do share. They are more reliable than your childhood “memories”. There are also Roche’s Point and Kilkenny stations to form a better picture. So Terry, there it is. You have been exposed as another fraud, who obviously has nothing better to do with your time. I recommend you get a life and go out and enjoy your beautiful corner of the country. It’s not being bombarded. I’ve shown you why. Your arguments don’t hold a drop of water, but I’m sure that won’t deter you. To be honest I couldn’t care less, but I have done you the decency of replying to your video and putting to bed your worries. Most people are intelligent enough to see through your empty psuedo-science, but of course there are always the few who came down in the last shower. It takes all sorts. https://youtube/watch?v=4sKDtL2cZCs
Posted on: Sun, 18 May 2014 14:23:53 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015