Bhramin were so cruel :’( …… or were they? The word - TopicsExpress



          

Bhramin were so cruel :’( …… or were they? The word Brahmin crates a image of a person in minds of many of a arrogant, stubborn, haughty, brimming with self-righteousness, self certification, know-all-attitude, best-of-best................ But a beast who was out to demonize all backwards till they die, who will whip them, beat them, deny other to read, nay even touch the holy scripture etc. Right? But the following are facts: 1. This picture of Brahmins was painted by British and this continues till today form last 2 centuries. 2. Brahmins have neither been rich nor powerful in Indian History. Do you know of any Brahmin king? Even Chanakya after making Chandragupta king, inspite of his begging, Chanakaya refused to rule. Historically they were never ever power hungry. 3. Even their close proximity with rulers, people high and famous did not change their condition. Sudama remained poor, while Lord Krishna was God. 4. On the other hands denied of any respectful or even menial profession they have been the poors of poor. Soceity won’t let them do anything else except perform poojas. Their earning can be only from Bhiksha. 5. Brahmins are arrogant, but still they are seen worshiping Goads of lower caste. In Purana Lord Shiva is Kiryata, who are today in India under ST Category 6. Most of the zamindars are OBC, and they are the one who oppressed Dalitis. But today both enjoy reservations, but the whipping dog is a Brahmin. Let all blame go on him. 7. All knowledge was confined by Brahmins, all knowledge restricted to themselves, but still a Valmiki writes Ramayana. Maharsihsi Vyas edits Vedas, though he was born of Matsgandha, a woman of lower caste. Vasistha, Rama, Kirshna, Valmiki, Buddha, Mahahavir, Tulasidas, Kabir, Swamy Vivekananda to name a few… all are non-Brahmins, and still blame it on Brahmins, that no one else was allowed to gain any knowledge. 8. Brahmins are Manuvadi… but Manu was himself not a Brahmin. So Brahmins folloing non Brahmins. Wow… See the other side also: 1. Aurangzeb killed 150000 brahmins, made a mountain form their skulls, not even sparing the kids, made a 10 mile long thread of their janeus (sacred thread that Brahmins put around). 2. Portuguese targeted preferably Brahmins. Barring few exception almost all were Brahmins. One famous person now revered almost like God, wrote back to Portugese king, “if there were no Brahmins, all Pagans would have converted to our faith”. 3. Not a single Sarswat Brahmin in Kashmir region as of now. Where did they go. All massacred and killed over centuries and being prosecuted today. Terrorist preferred target is Brahmins. (Kashmiri Pundits). Estimated more than 5 lacs Kashmiri Pundits have been driven out of Kashmir. 4. Dr.Ambedkar says the Muslim invader began conversion by circumcision of Brahmins. And those who refused were thrown in burning pyre. 5. In Melkote, Tipu Sultan kills 800 citizen, can you guess who they were? Now current status of Brahmins: 1. 50% of coolies on Delhi Railway Station are Brahmin. 2. 75% of cooks and domestic help in AP are Brahmins. 3. 60% of people below poverty line are Brahmins. 4. Per capita income as stated by Karnataka Finance Minister some time back is as follows: Christians: Rs.1562/-, Vokkailigas : Rs. 914/-, Muslims: Rs.794/- SC: Rs.680/-, ST: Rs.577/- and Brahmins: Rs.537/- 5. IN TN, the priest get Rs300 as emoluments plus one bowl of rice daily. Where is the minimum wages act? Not applicable to Brahmins? AND EVEN TODAY…..RSS, BJP IS PRO BRAHMIN PARTY ORGANIZATION…………….. BUT MAKE A SHUDRA AS A PM. Wake up to reality. Please.
Posted on: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 12:50:33 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015