Compare Reagan’s Berlin Wall speech with Kennedy’s earlier speech in Berlin. Which do you think does a better job of aligning with America’s foreign policy aims? Why? President Reagans speech was very different from Kennedys in that Kennedys speech seemed more personal in nature where Reagans seemed much more aligned with Americas foreign policy aims. Reagans speech focused on the reasons for example, why the Berlin Wall was constructed and what it symbolized. Whereas, Kennedys approach to me was one more of embracing the world as a whole instead of spending time talking about specific incidents and the reasons for them. Although this was necessary to a degree i think the risk in focusing on those areas too much is high as it can remove those listening from the personal side of human nature. Kennedys speech was more inspiring and personal but i think Reagans was much more in line with Americas agenda, especially in regards to war and why they start wars in the first place. Like the old saying goes create problems, create profit - all war has been induced for monetary gain so in the end, giving a speech that aligns itself with Americas agenda on foreign affairs is to me the opposite of what it should be - what Kennedy talked about more, which is freedom and what it really means. No one is free, never will be. It is all a facade and we are rats in a race but not for the prize we may think. America is in debt, always will be. There is no gold back up any longer and every time another dollar is made it automatically depreciates and it is impossible for Americas debt to ever come out ahead. Thats why war is created in the first place, to falsely create a hidden fear that ultimately serves the ones who are the Masterminds behind the curtain. Even the Berlin Wall was orchestrated in my opinion to serve the overall governments agenda, all financially driven as we are a dollar driven world instead of a resource driven world, on purpose. Taxpayers pay tax, which is not even legally required of us to do, just to pay the interest on the government loans. thats it. we are slaves of our own country and misled to believe otherwise. This system of operating is in default and the structure that we have now is solely to support those that have taken over the positions of our banking founding fathers such as J. P. Morgan Chase, Rockefeller etc..JP Morgan chase was the biggest bastard of all. Not only financing Edisons dc electrical discovery, but ultimately taking everyone down in his path to become the wealthiest man on earth at that time who played a role in developing the Federal Reserve thus loaning America $$ to get out of their debt back in the late 1800s. - what a joke! - Tesla was at least a stand up man who gave up his royalty rights to ac power as he held the patent in an effort to further the good of america. thats why the GDP is the way it is.. they dont want to make products like cars to last forever for example, that takes away from repeat business and so does finding a cure for cancer- why just think of the amount of jobs and financial loss that would mean?? unbelievable how we are all pawns in this sick, purposeful game of king on the mountain called the United States and in reality, the whole world.
Posted on: Sun, 30 Mar 2014 05:07:12 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015