Date Of Next Hearing The Suit No SC./69/2011 Going by the rulings of the Court (Justice Mahmud Mohammed) on 8th of April, 2013, it was obvious that the court deemed the Amended Brief Of Argument filed by Comandclem Nigeria Limited dully filed and served, and also deemed the Substantive Cross Appeal filed by Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited dully filed and served. The legal implication of this is that the Court expects the legal counsel of Comandclem Nigeria Limited to file a reply (Respondent’s Reply On Cross Appeal) to the Substantive Cross Appeal of Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited. In the same vein, the court also expects the legal counsel of Mobil Producing Nigeria Unlimited to file a reply (Respondent’s Reply on Amended Brief of Argument) to the Amended Brief Of Argument Of Comandclem Nigeria Limited. Those two correspondences are expected to be dully filed and served with ( eight weeks as provided for in the Supreme Court Rule of 1985 (As Amended), Order 6, Rule 5, Section 2. “The respondent shall file in the Court and serve on the appellant his own Brief within eight weeks after service on him of the Brief of the appellant. “ comandclemnewsupdate.blogspot/2013/06/the-official-report-of-legal_8.html
Posted on: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:32:42 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015