Does God Exist? The answer is very clear and common sense for - TopicsExpress



          

Does God Exist? The answer is very clear and common sense for anyone who want to see. This video gives you some basic signs and evidences just to stress this point. This post is not directed at atheists rather it’s an invitation, a friendly invitation to look into things deeper. When atheists suggest or claim that there is no such thing as the God. I would then ask them to come with one single thing that is nonexistent or doesn’t have objective reality. Let me explain that point, for instance an atheist say well superman isn’t real, well superman has human body (objective real), suits colors (objective real) etc take all these objectively real things away and you won’t have superman there anymore. What we humans do, we rearrange things (objectively real things)in one form or another to make “nonexistent things” but the problem is that, you can’t make nonexistent things from objectively real things you are just merely rearranging objectively real things, that’s it. For instance I make a firefly with jet propeller engine along with f16 jet wings, what I did is just merely rearranged objectively real things firefly (objective real), Jet propeller engine (objectively real), f16 jet wings (objectively real). If I take all these objectively real things away I won’t have the supposed nonexistent firefly with jet propeller engine along with f16 jet wings. In a nutshell no one can’t come with single that isn’t real, now keep that point in mind and let’s consider the God, but here we have a problem there are thousands type of the Gods… made by people, claimed by people over the centuries... etc Right?!.. okay why do you think it is like that ? if there is the GOD then why there is such confusion, well given the fact that no one can come with single thing that is nonexistent how come then people came with the idea of the God with so many variations or just like above examples it just mere rearrangements of objectively real (God). Thus the God to has objectively reality but the problem is, which one is it. Doesn’t this whole confusion, different images, concept of the God sounds like typical example of blind men describing the elephant ?!!!. Where to some it is round, to other it is cylindrical, to others it is like some flat flippers… why do these blind people had such concept, well simple they can’t see the elephant. Take another example would you call a dog (you have experience of, seen it thus objectively real and objectively different from the chicken) a chicken (you have experience of, seen it thus objectively real and objectively different from the chicken), off course not, none would, why ? because you have experience of it, you have seen it, it is objectively real and is different from the chicken. So in no culture, tradition, civilization would you see people differ from any other culture, tradition, civilization in terms of calling the dog , dog not the hen (no rearranging because everything clear). But when it comes to the God , you see every culture, tradition, civilization differ … why do you think it is like that… well the simple fact is none has seen the God the fact that these cultures, civilizations differed on the God is the explicit point that they just merely rearranged the God image, associated the attributes of the God to limited entities, to things that undermine the God and thus one can logically conclude that these entities, things can’t be the God. For instance let’s take Hittites one thousand gods, these were gods (rearranged) with humans and animals attributes but today we can confirm by logic and science that animals and humans are limited entities, came into existence several billion years after the big bang, thus can’t be the God. The same rearrangement of the God attributes happened in Hurrians where human figure (objectively real) Teshub has been called as the god of weather, but we know, can confirm by logic and science humans are limited entities, came into existence several billion years after the big bang, thus can’t be the God and plus that we know how weather works such analysis debunks the teshub. Now let’s come to Jesus pbuh which has been claimed by most Christians as the God, son of the God etc, while in the bible ot/nt there is no clear statement from jesus pbuh saying, “I am the God worship me” one should wonder then why do they the Christians associate jesus pbuh with the God, claim him to be the God consider this position to be the basis of present day Christianity when there is not one single statement by the jesus pbuh in the whole ot/nt that clearly states “I am the God, worship me”. Christianity isn’t that old compared to Hittites, Hurrians but still we find it somewhat similar in theology to those esp the hurrians. Anyway my point is not to criticize Christian belief but to highlight my position, to emphasize the importance and significance of my position. Similarly we see the God in a different image, attribute shapes in Hinduism, where either it is a buffalo or some blue human figure with different tools. We can debunks all these gods by using our rational faculties, logic, science now let’s take Islamic position. Muslim position of the God is as follow: chapter 12.001 Say, He is Allah, [who is] One, 112.002 Allah, the Eternal Refuge. 112.003 He neither begets nor is born, 112.004 Nor is there to Him any equivalent. and chapter 42 .11 There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing. No vision can grasp Him But His grasp is over All vision: He is Above all comprehension, Yet is acquainted with all things. [Al-Qur’an 6:103]) for more about the God read the glorious quran and the God knows the best. It makes sense the God should be eternal, because that solves infinite regression problem, there should be nothing equal to Him as He created everything, without any blue print, without any experimentation and when we compare anything, like I mentioned in the Hittites , hurrians, Christianity examples we see that people have associated the God attributes to limited entities (all of which came to existence after big bang, belongs to this limited reality) while surely the God can’t be a limited entity. Thus that also justifies the position that there is nothing like unto Him, since everything we see is objectively limited (in many many ways) can be confirmed via science, human reason, logic thus the God can’t be something that is limited in one way or another as that undermines the God. While off course since universe itself will end, had a beginning , is finite thus off course the God can’t be part of it, rather as an external Agent, it is simple logic. This concept, the Islamic position is well in line with human logic, science. AND THE GOD KNOWS THE BEST!
Posted on: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 20:04:49 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015