Duty Obligation To All Others This is my 300. This is my - TopicsExpress



          

Duty Obligation To All Others This is my 300. This is my Home Land. One Fed District Law, compliant ... You, DA, You, Chief Cop MO. You, MO Senate - Gov. You are everything that my Host mother taught me not to be. What not to be, thats what my host mother taught me from birth - 18. Just dont lie. Just dont steal. Just respect others. Simple three. Our 10th Amendment; Browns Supremacy Clause; Our Right To Self Defend against cops. You ticket money laundering man-sluts, every one of you. I accept your offensive moves against me and mine, countrywide: youtube/watch?v=muk4ctifMAo WIC, County-State Whores, thats all they are. Their boss is JP Morgan, James Dimon. Rothschild and Vatican et al. yep: May 17, 2007 Scott Hammond Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Chain Match > TR=TC Protocol (Burkle Illustrated) Mr. Hammond, This adds to prior debriefings. Below summarizes retail chains’ “match” policies, which are designed by top executives and maintained by those below them. I regret to inform that Bill Baer, among others, have long concealed this proof from Justice. Matching rival prices at pre-calculated monopoly levels (where P>MR=MC) is a clandestine protocol Wall Street firms have long hidden – in breach of many criminal laws and ethical rules. Certified transcript pages (Exhibits 1-8) are attached as proof. I. Top Chain Executive Regular Retail Price Instruction This testimonial confession by one executive price maker confession illustrates: Q. By Ms. Smith: “If Ralphs and Lucky are priced the same, will Vons match.” Did I read that correctly? A. The Witness: Yes. Q. By Ms. Smith: And was that consistent with consistent with the Executive Committee pricing instructions for 1997? A. The Witness: Yes. Q. By Ms. Smith: And is that consistent with the Executive Committee’s pricing instructions for the time period? A. The Witness: Yes. Q. By Ms. Smith: If you look over at Page 3, Mr. Del Santo, see Number 5: “If Vons is below Lucky and Ralphs, Vons will match Lucky and stay below Ralphs.” Did I read that correctly? A. The Witness: Yes. Q. By Ms. Smith: And is that consistent with the Executive Committee’s pricing instructions for the time period? A. The Witness: Yes. Q. Number 6: “If we have a Ralphs retail and no Lucky, match Ralphs.” Did I read that correctly? A. The Witness: Yes. Q. By Ms. Smith: And is that consistent with the Executive Committee’s pricing instructions for the time period? A. The Witness: Yes. II. “Match” Agreement By Checking Agreement The stabilized “matching” of regular retail prices at defined monopoly levels is an agreement monitored through another agreement – the price check access agreement. This testimony confirms the “match” at artificially high level policies are kept up by furnishing access, on request, to monitor rival compliance with the agreement: A. Our [agreement] policy is if the competitor allows us to price-check or price-survey, [then] we will allow them [in]to … our stores. A. [The contract is] [W]hen a [rival] price-check crew shows up at a store they introduce themselves to the [rival] manager, state … who they are, what they are there for and ask permission to price-check the store. A. [The agreement is] They can price-check any one of them at any given time. Crews of 5-10 people, equipped with electronic [optic hand gun] equipment, enter to retrieve price data. … Q. But if [rival’s are] … price checking, you can forbid them, right? A. Yes. III. The State of California Ordered A “No Agreement” Verdict After directly witnessing the above, the state of California ordered representatives of the Republic they may not infer an agreement from direct proof of agreement - and must override supreme court law about it; it did so by entirely twisting the facts before it. A. I said very early on in this case that it is not illegal to go into a competitor’s business and look at prices, and it isn’t. A. [T]his is clearly a circumstantial evidence case. I have seen no direct evidence of an agreement ….
Posted on: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:08:20 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015