Edi Rama tried to present itself as the complete opposite of his predecessor Sali Berisha Negligence or provocation of Albanias Edi Rama With modest , quiet and decent performance , Albanian Prime Minister Edi Rama said in a televised interview for Alsat - M, after meeting with Macedonian Prime Minister Nikola Gruevski , sought to present itself as the complete opposite of his predecessor Sali Berisha . Berisha said its not even tried to be ambiguous , and the best example is last years speech on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the Albanian state today , when he said : We celebrate the independence of all Albanian territories of transport to and from Presevo Skopje to Podgorica . Following sharp reactions from around the region and the West , he himself a moderate interpretation , meant that the spiritual unification of Albanians , not political . Rama , by contrast , was extremely attentive throughout the performance since come to Macedonia , until the moment when he was asked for an end to send a message to Albanians in Macedonia . - I believe that the Albanians as an essential constituent of this country have many reasons to be proud of what we have achieved here and to have so much more reason to go ahead and strive to make all things as they want and deserve Albanians - said Albanian Prime Minister . What kind of statehood spoke Rama ? Do you provoked Macedonian public or only expressed clearly enough ? Statehood is interpreted in many ways . Albanian politicians , as Rufi Osmani , would argue that the application of the Albanians is to have equal status as Macedonians . But constitutional law experts agree - Albanians already have equal status and are constituent part , but as citizens , according to the concept of the civil state to determine what the Macedonian constitutional amendments of 2001. It can be interpreted as a concept for a bi-national state , even more with the right to self-determination or secession federalization . Statement of Rama , they say , is not specific enough to assess whether or not a provocation , but legal and political is not clear how things stand . EQUAL as citizens primarily University Professor Savo Klimovski explains that statehood is treated as an element with four components : a state that has a specific territory , boundaries , population and symbols . - In the Constitution of 1991 clearly defined that Macedonia is a state of the Macedonian people and of all nationalities living here . The amendments of 2001 and the Framework Agreement that redefine and allow many communities to be virtually equal to statehood with the Macedonian people - says Klimovski . According to him , the statement of Albanian Prime Minister should be interpreted in the context that all citizens are equal in Macedonia and Albanians statehood as citizens , not as a separate nation . - We opted for civil concept , as well as Europe , because the other concept is outdated . In this sense , all citizens are equal and are obliged to contribute to the state - concluded Klimovski . Professor Osman Kadriu , there may be more constituent peoples , not just one, and that those still in the formation of the country have a dominant role to create . These , he said , he assumed the key historical and legal task of creating the state and have agreed together to share the fate and responsibility for it. - With regard to the rights and obligations of all citizens of Macedonia are equal . But we know that the creation of Macedonian institutions all have the same role . Back in 1984, while Macedonia was part of the Yugoslav federation , had a definition that people are responsible for it are Macedonians , Albanians and Turks . It is logical and by the age of these communities and by their numbers - said staff. Statehood NOT SELF-DETERMINATION As for self-determination , however , the professor reminds us that Macedonia unambiguously determined by the state as a unitary character and it is confirmed in practice by the framework agreement . Statehood , according to the explanation of Professor Tanya Jovanovski Karakamiseva - incurred faculty , is a theoretical question and not put into the Constitution as a template . That , she adds , is more political phrase , which means that some people participate in the institutions of a country , a community that is part of the state . All communities that are part of the state , therefore, statehood . - Although often leading to statehood in the same context with self-determination or other international rights community , those two things are not related in any way - highlights Karakamiseva - Jovanovski. But Professor Goran Ilic of the Faculty of Law University of Bitola is straight - theoretically speaking, constituent or constituent nation s majority population of a country , one that creates its institutions . - In our case it is clear that it was the Macedonian people that the referendum in 1991 clearly expressed its willingness to separate from the Yugoslav federation and a state. It is clearly specified in the preamble of the Constitution of 1991 , but not disturbed nor preamble after 2001 , when adopted framework agreement - says Ilic . He explains that as part of the constituent peoples are considered and all others who respect it and will participate in the formation of institutions . It is called constitutional patriotism and is present in countries such as Germany or the United States . - In this regard, all other communities mentioned in the preamble after 2001 to incorporate and become a constituent part of the country . Theres a big difference between being that and being separate constituent nation . The latter can be interpreted as a right to self-determination . According to it , a statement of political Edi Rama can be interpreted in many ways , but legally speaking it is not specific enough to conclude whether or not provocation - said Ili
Posted on: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 06:56:19 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015