Excerpt from the Berkeley.edu website (University of California Museum of Paleontology) Biologists say, yes, natural selection operates on species giving them selective advantages for survival such as color changes for a moth, but it has not the power to transform a deer into a whale. On this point, there is plenty of debate and growing rejection even among evolutionists. Here are almost 1,000 Physicians and Surgeons who reject Darwin’s claims of common ancestry via natural selection and further in this post are 26 more Nobel Laureates and over 800 other Ph.D. scientists who also reject the notion. Remember, no one disputes microevolution, changes within species, mutations and variations that may cause a bacteria to become resistant to medications. Everyone is on board with this kind of evolution. The problem is one of terminology. Evolution is rife with convolution right down to the meaning of the word evolution. Here are about 800 scientists who reject Darwinism and are brave enough to publicly state so. Many have paid a stern price for their defiance of Darwinian materialist dogma as evidenced by the many documented cases of censorship, intimidation and job loss. Physicist Eric Hedin is experiencing it right now as he is under attack from a radical atheist group and a prominent scientist. Here are 21 famous Nobel Prize winners who reject/rejected Darwinism and here are seven more Nobel Laureates. pssiinternational/docs/pssi-members-list-07232011.pdf
Posted on: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 05:24:12 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015