FALSE DOCTRINE... Last year I posted an article on my page and - TopicsExpress



          

FALSE DOCTRINE... Last year I posted an article on my page and have now come to realize that I made an extremely atrocious error. I thought that as long as there was a disclaimer at the beginning of the article (ex. “I’m by no means a theologian or a scholar - mistakes on my end are always a possibility”), speculation, error, and carelessness was licensed. First and foremost, the speculation within the article wasn’t even presented as such. It was presented as fact (ex. Satan’s rebellion - his motives, his strategy, the timing of his rebellion, the genetics of the antichrist”, “the form in which the mark of the beast will come”, the form in which the image of the beast will come, “humans replacing fallen angels”, the meaning of Zechariah 5, peoples perception of the two witnesses, ETC… ETC… ETC…) – THERE IS NO WAY TO VERIFY ANY OF THIS, AND SOME OF IT HAS ALREADY BEEN PROVEN FALSE (its important to note that the above are just a handful of random examples. There are many more issues than just those listed above). Speculation and worldly chatter are warned about in 2 Timothy 2. Speculation can lead to false teaching and false prophecy, which is exactly what this article was full of. It was a piece of work which contained vast amounts of error mixed with SOME truth, and is therefore extremely dangerous. It is a false gospel, and was an extremely atrocious thing to put together and post. THE BIBLE IS 100% TRUE, however, the article I posted took the Gospel truth and added poison to it. I would like to warn people about getting involved with, and steeped in end times intrigue (as I did). No matter how anxious you feel about the world and the direction it’s headed, end times intrigue (and speculation in general) is an extremely dangerous path to walk. In some cases, you’ll genuinely believe you’re acquiring a stronger understanding of the truth, when in fact, you’re trading the truth (Bible/Gospel) for a lie (speculation, false teaching, and false prophecy). I believe it is important for people to study Biblical warnings (past/present/future) and examine their relevance with regards to our world today. However, when one does so, its paramount to hold fast to the Bible and the Bible alone. I failed in this regard, so for those of you who viewed the article posted on my page last year, you need to dismiss it as a sham and a lie (because that’s what it is). The only 100% guaranteed document of truth is the Bible, and I failed to respect that fact. I would also like to mention that even if some of the predictions presented in the article do come true (ex. War with Russia / WW3, Roman Catholic introduction of ETI Dogma, etc…), this will not legitimize the fraudulence of the article, as even a lying prophet can successfully predict the future (read Deut.13:1-3). In my arrogance, I attempted to understand something without first conducting a comprehensive study of it. Afterwards, as I did pursue a comprehensive study of the Bible, I started to realize that I was a textbook case of both a deceiver, and the deceived (2Pet.2, 2Tim, Gal.5:7-10, Matt.24:11-12). This entire ordeal was an extremely serious error, and I can’t begin to tell people how important it is not to follow in my footsteps and promote speculation, lies, and false doctrine (or worst of all, take part in its authorship). It spins out of control way faster than one would think, and you won’t come to realize the gravity of your error and the sin youve committed until after the fact (assuming you’re even fortunate enough to come to that realization). If there’s one thing I’ve learned about theology, it’s that people should stick to the Bible and the Bible alone. If I had of done so, none of this would have happened. Theres a high likelihood of serious consequence to my error (Rev.22:18-19), so please, don’t take this warning lightly. The article was garbage and should be remembered/treated as such. (There are two final issues Id like to address. In the article it was stated that people will only be forgiven if they refrain from making the same mistake twice. I have a horrible memory, but I think this was intended as a figure of speech. Regardless as to the intention, it was wrong. What should have been said was: read Rom.6 and Heb.10:26. Also, I stated that Freemasons [Shriners etc...] always do good deeds to push a Satanic agenda. Ive come to learn that many Freemasons are unaware of the potential issues behind their organizations, and are therefore sincere in their efforts to help people. Having said that, I was totally wrong in stating that their motives are always evil. As a matter of fact, my entire interpretation, explanation, and commentary on Matt.6:1-4/Matt.5:14-16 should just be discarded because I really didnt know what I was talking about - and still dont)
Posted on: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:04:32 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015