Face it Book continued: Whats the view of most on the continued investigations and questions of the Kennedy assassination? Is this at last something we should move from, and accept that enough investigation has already been done in the past 50 years? That seems to be the general view of upper level media sources; although some suggest that we are not yet capable of an original expression and disclosure, proven by the vast array of conforming and rote documentaries on this subject. I think a crime, and illegal activity, of this nature, of national and international importance, should not be left in question, should not be swept under the rug and moved on from. That kind of thinking sets the precedent for all further investigations of illegalities, both national and international; just as we have been left with in the crime of 9/11, 2001. (Remember, there wasnt even going to be a government investigative commission until too much pressure was applied by families of victims. And even that has left us skeptical and wanting.) If we are willing to live with error upon error, clout upon clout, building our foundations on sand, of this level of importance, then the society we erect from there on, and the societies of democracies that other nations erect, will always be erroneous and suspect. What is the verdict, in detail, of JFKs assassination that we are officially supposed to accept, and move on from? Can we put it into words? Even if we can utter a few things, is this enough to substantiate a closed case of assurance, that we can then build our trustworthy and reputable futures on? I dont see it. True justice is not like eating a sandwich of erroneous and fearful ingredients that you can just deficate and move on from, eating something else later. The problem must be rooted out, exposed, made aware, and why... for all to realize. Then we can decide if we want to eat more of those sandwiches, or move on to something else...
Posted on: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 23:21:40 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015