Hillary Clinton Hates America, But Loves Herself Posted by Rick Wells on Jul 17, 2013 in Benghazi, Congressional Arrogance, Culture, Politics Hillary Clinton’s speech at the African American Delta Sigma Theta Sorority is the latest installment in the never-ending pander-fest which is the Democrat party and its politics of “Power and Party First, Country Be Damned”. This shameless career politician has no problem with a double standard as long as it serves her political interests. Her position, as evidenced in her infamous quote of “What Difference At This Point Does it Make?” was an effort to portray as insignificant, outdated and frivolous a legitimate investigation into her actions regarding the attacks on September 11, 2012. This investigation includes questions regarding her secretive and possibly deceptive role in a cover-up or possible direct involvement in the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi. The verdict, in apparent conflict with the intentions of those partisan race baiters and vendors of civil discourse, cannot be allowed to go unchallenged by the democrats. If they can’t make a campaign vehicle out of George Zimmerman one way, they’ll dispatch their hacks in the Federal branch to step in and take over. Once again, equality under the law is not equal. The elites control and manipulate the legal system as just another of their many tools to be used for the maintenance of power and position. The remarks of former Secretary of State Clinton during the Benghazi hearings are noteworthy for their hypocrisy on two glaring points. First, she dismissed as irrelevant in a “water under the bridge”, what difference does it make, response the unexplained deaths of four Americans under conditions which are suspicious at best, and quite possibly criminal. Conversely, she rants as unacceptable the findings in a public forum of a citizen jury, regarding the death of one man, who to some degree initiated the altercation which resulted in his death. In a decision between the Libyan deaths of four patriotic Americans or one dead American of questionable character and intent, she chooses the position which will deflect attention away from herself and which will ingratiate her base, furthering her political goals. The divisive means used to create racial tension and division are apparently justified by their politically beneficial ends. Then, there is the question of the amount of time which has passed, the foundation of Clinton’s “old news”, we’ve got more important issues to deal with argument. The Martin/Zimmerman incident took place on February 26th, 2012, six and a half months before the Benghazi attack. Wouldn’t it follow that the Martin issue would be less significant than the Benghazi deaths based upon the facts, the timeline and the number of dead? Is this just more deflection and blatant pandering by a career democrat? Is Hillary Clinton seeking to redirect the discussion into an area in which she can expand her political position and escape accountability for political damaging miscalculations and misdeeds? Sure looks like it.
Posted on: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 08:52:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015