I am surprised by the Senates actions today on filibuster use. I know that they have only removed it as an option to prevent stall tactics on presidential nominees, but now that it has been done, how long will it be before the majority party (which ever it is at the time) removes it as a minority party option on other votes as well? The benefit is that it will be easier for any president to at least get a straight yes or no vote on candidates for key offices instead of having all of their nominees filibustered by the minority party (a practice that has been going on since Reagan was in office). I personally dislike the filibuster tactic of prevention and would rather see a straight vote on all topics. However, I do understand the importance of the tool in allowing a minority presence in the legislative branch of government a means of preventing the majority from passing sweeping changes that may not be in the countrys best interest overall. The vote passed 52-48. According to https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42964.pdf As of October 31, 2013, in the House of Representatives, there are 231 Republicans, 206 Democrats (including 5 Delegates and the Resident Commissioner), and 4 vacant seats. The Senate has 45 Republicans, 53 Democrats, and 2 Independents, who caucus with the Democrats. All 45 Republicans voted against the change, 52 of those aligned with the Democrats voted for it. 3 of those aligned with the Democrat policy makers voted against. Making it a near even split.
Posted on: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:10:26 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015