I dont condone resisting arrest. And lethal force is necessary - TopicsExpress



          

I dont condone resisting arrest. And lethal force is necessary if, and only if force is threatened lethally. If an un-armed person resists a trained fully armed officer, the officer should be trained to mase and club that individual until they are subdued. Rodney King was a shock to most people, because it was 5 on 1 with batons and that more than subdued him, it almost killed him. There just happened to be a camera in his case, very uncommon at the time. No life should be taken because of resisting arrest while unarmed. Plain and simple. —But— Just like when Trayvon Martin happened, I say the same thing. When ever a story is plastered all over every major media outlet like this, there is a bigger story that should have peoples attention. In this case, we have an begun WW3 with ISIS, we are in the middle of an epic economic collapse, and Russia is stockpiling gold to create a new dominant Central Bank by joining with China. If you dont see war written all over this, just go look back in history to every King, Emperor, Dictator, or President who tried stockpiling gold for the same purpose. Then look at said outcome. Look at the foundation of this country and why it had more to do with banking than anything. The civil war was a preconceived idea in attempt to take over America by dividing its people. Its 2014 people. Instead of hovering skateboards and flying cars, weve embraced the divide with only more bombs and bigger guns. Creating only bigger industries for war. So how can we expect change to come when we allow our kids to play Call Of Duty: Modern Warfare or Grand Theft Auto V where they learn shooting cops is fun with zero consequences. This is our world. When we fully understand that, we will fully embrace one another.
Posted on: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:11:26 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015