I love this kind of thing, what we have here is an unbelievably intelligent man, completely educated and armed with scientific evidence and theoretical limitations/failures, discussing evolution. This is good, and this kind of person is the type which forwards our intelligence through debate and discussion with other, equally intelligent people. His argument being used by less intelligent people to supposedly disprove evolution is a disservice to the world, due to the fact that he is intelligent enough to continually allude to the fact that we do not yet know enough about the subject. This is not an absolute stance on evolution being untrue, it is instead a discussion that the evidence we have at this point might potentially lean towards Darwinian evolution theories not being correct. For example, he states that bugs stay bugs and that there SEEMS to be a species limitation. What we actually know is that we are simply looking at a slice of the total existence of life on this planet through the lens of fossils or whatever trace elements were left over the years....to attempt to state that species limitation proves there is no evolution is ludicrous because we do not have enough evidence to actually make that claim, nor have we analyzed enough potential combinations to say for a fact that bugs stay bugs. I would love love love to see Neil Degrasse Tyson or Stephen Hawking debate Mr. Berlinski. Please please please, if either of you can arrange that and you can hear me, please make it happen! #neildegrassetyson #billmaher
Posted on: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:31:31 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015