I question a lot of things. Im not naturally negative, yet people today perceive someone like me as so. Unless of course, it has been presented that blind acceptance is foolish. If you hand me a glass of something, I will not check to see if it is half full or if its half empty. I will want to know what is in it, and more importantly, the quality. This is my questioning, this is what you call my cynicism. I however, know content and quality are more important than quantity but not as so much as to make it an "all or nothing" decision. "Prioritized higher", would suit me better. So after we determine the content and its quality only then will I decide to get excited for its quantity. Because who in their right mind wants a glass of warm piss. Anyways I digress. That had nothing to do with why I am posting. I question the validity of recursion in the persons psyche. I attended a lecture on it and it got me thinking about the merger of pseudo science with valid psychology. Now dont wave the bloody shirt, I know once it was called the same but we all can agree that to an extent psychology is very valid since at least the 50s. So on recursions being the interpersonal dynamics of habit via brain chemistry and metaphorical muscle memory in personality and reaction, I hold that changing ones environment or brain chemistry will not reflect in a jointly related effect yet perhaps only correlated one on the pursuit of personal happiness or true change. Thoughts? Maybe I need to rephrase. Or even clarify.
Posted on: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 04:47:18 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015