I was wrong so it might have discouraged you. I think I fixed it now With the existence of life, the planets, universe, and galaxy, we seek to come to terms with a possible starting point. It is this idea of a starting point that points to the existence of a higher power. Creating something from nothing is a supernatural event. One can wonder what spawned what spawned the big bang? Where the gases came from; the origin of plant life; the possible evolution of plant life; the origins of the seeds. The existence of every species that requires a model and to be fed in the early stages of development can be said to defy logic in the creationist sense of infancy; a change from a rudimentary single celled organism to a capable host producing intelligent life forms. With evolution, there is a necessity to provide a theoretical explanation for the evolution of species to their present day form. We must consider how the multitude of species that populate the earth survived infancy. This is the most fragile period in a life. If we evolved to grow more resilient, then why are infants so fragile and dependent? A possible shift from self- sufficiency to reliance on a nurturing parent may point to a regression in evolutionary change. What would spurn this nurturing behavior? A shift from self-sufficiency when thinking of self-fertilization and reproduction would seem to be a likewise regressionary change. The initiation of intercourse as a means of reproduction seemingly represents an insensately change that would required male and female members of each species to have developed and changed simultaneously. By observing mammals who reproduce in this manner held in captivity, we have not seen a switch back to self-fertilization as a survival mechanism. We must consider the most likely possibility that these changes never occurred. The idea of rudimentary beginnings to life on the planet, does not address these simple questions of logical feasibility of the theory. The complexity of genetic codes of current species, display a plenitude of marked differences between every example of cognitional life on the planet. There also exists a differentiation of members of the same species. How can we say we evolved from limited genetic material when it must of resulted in Significantly more than 8.7 million different reactions with the same material? What outside force could have created our emphatic differences? An attempt was made to come up with a scientific explanation of our existence, but the big bang theory cant in any way come close to explaining the origins of the building blocks of our reality. The big bang didnt conquer origin, it was a reaction amongst buiding blocks that already existed. Something gave us our existence; there can never be a scientific explanation.
Posted on: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:44:47 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015