“IKAW AY KATOLIKO” ARGUMENT PRESENTED: HINDI RAW ESPESYAL NA TAO LANG ANG PANGINOONG JESUS SIYA RIN DAW AY TUNAY NA DIYOS DAHIL SI CRISTO DAW AY NAGTATAGLAY DIN NG “DIBINONG KALAGAYAN” (DIVINE NATURE) . Mga talatang ginamit niyang batayan ni “IKAW “ ay Katoliko: MATEO 3:16-17 -- Jn 5:19, 21; 10:30, 38 ; 14:9-10 (HINDI Juan 10:9-10!); 14:7; 16:15; 17:21 -- Fil 2:5-7; Col 2:9; Hebreo 1:8 https://facebook/photo.php?fbid=600133830108975&set=a.246366985485663.53769.100003370904303&type=1&theater REFUTED BY LIGAYA T. VICTORINO -- PART 1 TAMA ang mga talatang sinipi mo “IKAW AY KATOLIKO” YUN NGA LANG … MALI ANG PAGKAUNAWA MO ! _______________________________________________ HINDI MABABASA sa mga talatang sinipi mo na “SI CRISTO ANG IISANG TUNAY NA DIYOS!” _______________________________________________ Maging ang mga PARI na sila RAYMOND E BROWN AT PETER FINLAY AY HINDI SUMASANG-AYON SA ARGUMENTO MO: JESUS IS NEVER CALLED GOD, in the Synoptic Gospels (MATTHEW, MARK & LUKE ) and a passage like Mk.10:18 would seem to preclude the possibility that Jesus used the title of himself. EVEN THE FOURTH GOSPEL (JOHN) NEVER PORTRAYS JESUS AY SAYING SPECIFICALLY THA HE IS GOD. The sermons which Acts attributes to the beginning of the Christian mission do not speak of Jesus as God. Thus, there is no reason to think that Jesus was called God in the earliest layers of New Testament tradition. This negative conclusion is substantiated by THE FACT THAT PAUL DOES NOT USE THE TITLE IN AN EPISTLE written before 58. (Brown, Raymond E. JESUS GOD AND MAN Modern Biblical Reflections. [ Milwaukee: The Bruce Publishing Company, 1967, ] p. 30 emphasis mine) -- “That Christ was MAN, MAN IN ALL CREDENTIALS like to other man, IS PLAIN ON THE FACE OF THE GOSPELS. Born In Bethlehem of human mother, some nineteen hundred and twenty years ago. HE WAS MADE OF FLESH AND BLOOD AS WE ARE MADE.” (7) “The character of Christ is set out for us very fully and very clearly in the Gospels. HE WAS A MAN OF RARE INTELLECTUAL POWERS” (p.9) (WAS CHRIST GOD? By Rev. Peter Finlay, S.J. [ Nihil Obstat: Michael Canonicus Cronin, S.T.D Imprimi Protest: Eduradus, Archiep, Catholic Truth Society of ireland7 & 8 Lower Abbey Street] pp. 7, 9 emphasis mine) ______________________ “IKAW AY KATOLIKO” VERSUS Rev. Peter Finlay, S.J. Rev. Raymond E. Brown WHICH IS WHICH? ______________________ SA KABILANG DAKO, ANG ARAL NG INC NA ANG PANGINOONG JESUCRISTO AY ESPESYAL NA TAO AY LETRA-POR-LETRA NA NAKASULAT SA BIBLIA: “My fellow Israelites, listen to these words; JESUS FROM NAZARETH WAS A VERY SPECIAL MAN.” ( Acts 2:22, Easy-To Read Version[ emphasis mine] ) -_________________________________________________ HINDI SINASABI SA TALATANG ITO NA, BUKOD SA ESPESYAL NA TAO ANG CRISTO AY SIYA PA RIN ANG IISANG TUNAY NA DIYOS! _________________________________________________ PART 2 MALING –MALI ANG INTERPRETASYON MO (IKAW AY KATOLIKO”) NA DAHIL SA CLAIM MO NA “MAY DIBINONG KALAGAYAN” ANG CRISTO AY NANGANGAHULUGANG SIYA NA NGA ANG IISANG TUNAY NA DIYOS! Ang mga tagapagmana man ay kabahagi rin ng “divine nature,” NGUNIT HINDI NANGANGAHULUGANG SILA ang (IISANG) TUNAY NA DIYOS NA BINABANGGIT NG BIBLIA! -- Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these YE MIGHT BE PARTAKERS OF THE DIVINE NATURE,having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust. ( 2 Pet. 1:4 KJV, [emphasis mine] ) Ang kumbas ng “DIVINE NATURE” sa talatang ito ay “KABANALAN” gaya ng pagkakasalin sa Bibliang Tagalog. Kaya ang pagiging “divine” ay HINDI KATUMBAS ng pagiging IISANG TUNAY NA DIYOS! Ang mga tagapagmana man ay kabahagi rin ng “divine nature,” NGUNIT HINDI NANGANGAHULUGANG SILA ang (IISANG) TUNAY NA DIYOS NA BINABANGGIT NG BIBLIA! ____ CATHOLICS DON’T KNOW THE ANSWER! https://facebook/groups/540046162728515/
Posted on: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 00:08:37 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015