In Canada we suffer from the fact that unmonitored / unregulated money is spent freely during the pre-election to slander all who dare to stand and for Government accountability. Bill C-23 purposely restricts students and others who are less likely to vote for the Conservatives by not actively providing them information they require to vote and a short election window with very little time to correctly register. Bill C-23 is in direct violation of the requirements of Good Government Democracy and in violation of constitutional intent of Canadian Constitution Act (1867) section 91 91. It shall be lawful for the Queen, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate and House of Commons, to make laws for the Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada, Canadas election flawed laws are the reason we not able to obtain a Good Government. If you are in doubt for a second that about the about this. Look at the FIFA, TPP and CETA investment treaties. These are secret agreements and are particularly harmful because they denies public access to arbitration case decisions miss-leading the public into believing their government is able to exercise sovereign powers and denying the public and Government sovereignity required for good Government of Canada. Political finances - conflicts of interest - lobbying - justice (2008) ISBN 978-92-871-6355-4 - political money may buy access to office and access to decision makers. Those in a position to contribute have a greater chance to be heard by political decision makers. And those able to finance political parties and electoral pre-election campaigns have bigger chance to secure places on election lists of established by political parties; LOOK at Bill C-23 and you see it is a bill to create an UNfair Election Act, The Conservatives “Canada Election Act” prevents Elections Canada from educating voters so that they may vote in a fair election. Further the Conservatives added a loop hole to enable them to selectively encourage their known supporters to participate. (3) The commercial value of services provided to a registered party for the purpose of soliciting — by mail, telephone or other electronic means — monetary contributions is not an election expense under subsection (1), as long as the soliciting is directed only towards individuals who have made at least one monetary contribution of $20 or more to the registered party or to one of its registered associations, nomination contestants or candidates in the five years before polling day for the election period in which the services are provided.
Posted on: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:46:06 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015