In the looking glass world of the United Nations, anti-Semitism is the rule rather than the exception, raising the question of whether UN officials are bribed to attack Israel. The former Israel rapporteur of the UN Human Rights Council, Princeton Law Professor Richard Falk, who recently stepped down after 6 years leaving the position vacant, outrageously has claimed (8/14/14) that any attempt to get rid of Hamas is a crime, in spite of the explicit language in Hamass charter which calls for the genocide of all Jews and the obliteration of the State of Israel. Using similar logic, the UNHRC, In the 7 years since it was chartered, has condemned Israel more often than all other countries combined, in spite of the widespread humanitarian disasters involving millions of civilians in other countries. This raises the question as to whether the partiality of the UN is equivalent to anti-Semitism, and whether the organization has secretly been receiving funds from Islamic powers who also continually defame the Jewish State. Has the UN or any of its agents or employees received BRIBE MONEY to harass Israel? The twisted logic of Falk wont withstand legal scrutiny, therefore corruption may be inferred. Who paid him to lie about the law? Qatar, Saudi Arabia--who?!
Posted on: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 19:04:46 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015