It is atheistic dogma, not science, to dismiss design as - TopicsExpress



          

It is atheistic dogma, not science, to dismiss design as unscientific. The argument that science cannot suggest that intelligence comes from intelligence or design from an intelligent designer is simply a tautology. It is dogma masquerading as science Michael Turner, astrophysicist at the University of Chicago and Fermilab - Explaining the fine-tuning of the universe: “The precision is as if one could throw a dart across the entire universe and hit a bullseye one millimeter in diameter on the other side.” Paul Davies, professor of theoretical physics at Adelaide University: “The really amazing thing is not that life on Earth is balanced on a knife-edge, but that the entire universe is balanced on a knife-edge, and would be total chaos if any of the natural ‘constants’ were off even slightly. Steven Weinberg, recipient of the Nobel Prize in Physics, and an anti-religious agnostic, notes that “the existence of life of any kind seems to require a cancellation between different contributions to the vacuum energy, accurate to about 120 decimal places.” As the website explains, “This means that if the energies of the Big Bang were, in arbitrary units, not: 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 But instead: 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 There would be no life of any sort in the entire universe.” Roger Penrose, the Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the University of Oxford, writes that the likelihood of the universe having usable energy (low entropy) at its creation is “one part out of ten to the power of ten to the power of 123.” That is “a million billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion zeros.” Honest atheists — scientists and lay people — must now acknowledge that science itself argues overwhelmingly for a Designing Intelligence. And honest believers must acknowledge that the existence of a Designing Intelligence is not necessarily the same as the existence of benevolent God. To posit the existence of a Creator requires only reason. To posit the existence of a good God requires faith. — Dennis Prager nationalreview/article/351319/why-some-scientists-embrace-multiverse-dennis-prager
Posted on: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 14:51:52 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015