Ito, Patrica - Out, Colleagues, There has been some academic and law confusion about what body of law to which American citizens are subject: inferior county-state law or America’s constitution, common law. Common law is the very simple stuff every first year law student is required to learn. In no law school in the nation is any law student required to learn any State laws double stuff, most of which merely parrots federal statutory law anyway. Indeed, the Bar Exam does not even test on any State Law – none whatsoever. The attached information provides some background on this subject, for academic and lay information. Many don’t know it, but one has a choice to be either a singular American citizen, or a double citizen subject to two governments, the Federal State and the State-State: "There are two classes of citizens under our form of two republic governments, citizens of the United States and of the state; and one may be a citizen of the former without being a citizen of the latter." The Power Is Called Into Play Whenever the judicial power is called into play, it is responsible directly to the fundamental law, and no other authority can intervene to force or authorize the judicial body to disregard it. “It cannot be presumed that any clause in the constitution is intended to be without effect; … construction is inadmissible, unless the words require it.” Duty Enforce The Supreme Law Not Inferior State Stuff No State Order Binds Anyone “The duty is to declare and enforce the rule of the supreme law and reject that of an inferior act of legislation which,” transcending the Constitution is of no effect and binding on no one.” There exists a situation such that inferior county government operators have aligned with inferior state law stuff. That happens when lawyers are required to take a double oath to two Nations two bodies of largely twin laws. This lawyer only oath is in perfect conflict with the Supremacy Clause; it’s a point of “Jurisdiction”, meaning the power to entertain double law: Double Oath – A Supreme Solemn Mockery "Why does a judge swear to discharge his duties agreeably to the constitution of the United States, if that constitution forms no rule for his government?" "If such be the real state of things, that is worse than solemn mockery. To prescribe, or to take this oath, becomes equally a crime." Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 48 So. 788, 160 Ala. 155 (1909). Yakus v. U.S., 321 U.S. 414, at page 468 (1944). MARBURY v. JAMES MADISON, 5 U.S. 137 (FEBRUARY, 1803). Adkins v. Children’s Hospital of District of Columbia, 261 U.S. 525, 544 (1923). Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
Posted on: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 22:02:36 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015