Ive asked Rom to correct me if the following is wrong, please... - TopicsExpress



          

Ive asked Rom to correct me if the following is wrong, please... What Rom Stover is saying is, that when we register anything with the corporation/s who are masquerading as our government/s, they create a Legal Trust for these chattels and in a corporate fiction NAME. (eg; ROSS BRADLEY - Check your Licence?) This then becomes (they make the NAME) the Legal Title to your land, boat or, car, etc. They (the settlor - like Banks, Councils, Finance Cos, etc) then install themselves as the EQUITABLE TITLE holder, on the trust. That gives them the ability to gain full control and title to property while someone else owns legal title. That Maxim of law, again? < He who holds Legal Title cannot hold Equitable Title > Or, as Rom says...the thing itself. < The person who creates the trust is the settlor. The person who holds the property for anothers benefit is the trustee. The person who is benefited by the trust is the beneficiary, or cestui que trust. The property that comprises the trust is the trust res, corpus, principal, or subject matter. > < The United States, a state, or a Municipal Corporation can take and hold property as trustee. This arrangement usually occurs when a settlor creates a trust for the benefit of a military academy or a state college, or when the settlor sets aside property as a park for the community. The failure of a settlor to name a trustee does not void a trust. The court appoints a trustee to administer the trust and orders the person having legal title to the property to convey it to the appointed trustee. > legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary/trust You are the living flesh and blood beneficiary of the Trust, but: The UNlawful trick-shot (the deceit/fraud after the above event), is that when in any dispute and in their court of law, etc.... they will 1st ask you of (are you?) the fiction NAME. And when you agree (consent) to it - and as it is not written as such on the Trust contract - the court (the justice) will then assume that you (the Legal holder of the trust) must then also be the trustee - and thus, you then become fully LIABLE. At all times, they remain the EQUITABLE TITLE holder. Now that seems pretty fair, wouldnt we all agree? (NOT) As we now know all this - - THEY clearly have a problem. Because, should you NOT consent to that trust NAME in court (and become the trustee for them), they will coerce you and often arrest and assault you or, they even imprison living flesh and blood persons (man/women) until the man/women (under duress), contract to the Trust fiction NAME and become the trustee for them. That problem that they now have? Well ...... since September 1, 2013, all the judges, lawyers, police, government officials, and those posing as government officials, and all officers of corporate franchises and entities organized under the auspicess of the UNITED STATES and its STATE franchises become fully, personally, and commercially liable for their actions and omissions against the living beneficiaries of the public trusts (APOSTOLIC LETTER ISSUED MOTU PROPRIO) Yes, as living flesh and blood persons (man/women), we ARE the living beneficiaries of these public trusts
Posted on: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 04:19:11 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015