JUBILEE EVERY SEVEN YEARS? 20140703 mike montagne — Thursday, July 3, 2014 at 12:06:28 PM PST | Thursday, July 3, 2014 at 7:06:28 PM GMT: The subject image alleges debts are to be forgiven every seven years. But the Bible said nothing of the kind. Obviously, the image portrays a preposterous misunderstanding of the ostensible period of time. But what also of the ostensible commandment to periodically forgive debt? Much research indicates on the contrary that Jubilee — as an ostensible forgiving of all debts — was not only never even practiced, but that the proposition further lacks any roots akin to ostensible divine inspiration. Jubilee nonetheless *never* implied that *anything at all* was practiced every seven years. On the contrary then, lacking any divine root for the alleged obligation to periodically forgive debt, effectively, Jubilee pertains to no more than a period of time comprised of either 49 or 50 years, depending upon interpretation. Effectively then, as much as we can truly know it, Jubilee is no more than a week of years. But think about an ostensible commandment that our debts to each other be *periodically* dissolved: Money is only of use to us as representation of entitlement. As much then as redeemability of that entitlement descends inherently from promissory obligations... thus fulfillment of our promissory obligations to each other is the only hope of a humanity which makes the only reasonable use of money. Oh, and God commanded us just every 49 or 50 years to just abandon our vital obligations to each other? Why in fact... particularly as no injury whatsoever is inflicted upon ourselves (moreover) by issuance of promissory obligations, which are inherently to pay or thus to redeem no more than the principal? It is far more probable then that God would have forbidden not only usury, but the imposition of usury upon an obfuscation of our promissory obligations, which *obfuscation* illegitimately transforms our obligations to redeem money into falsified debts to a pretended banking system. In any case, the two propositions are mutually exclusive, because you would never have a reason to forgive *obfuscated debts* if you observed the alternate commandment, which in advising us to neither pay nor charge more than the principal, would compel us to understand it is in fact impossible to lend money into existence. Therefore it is in fact impossible to borrow legitimate money into existence. Nor is there any legitimate basis for purported interest, for neither does a banking system which gives up no commensurable consideration in merely publishing further representations of our promissory obligations to each other, have *any* consideration even at stake — as only ostensibly justifies interest. WE therefore are the only possible, veritable issuers of money — for our promissory obligations, issued only by our own volition, give money its only legitimate legal and monetary substance. Effectively then, in the ONLY legitimate issuance of money, WE acquire property from each other for an obligation to repay what we receive in our own production. And God forbid our fulfillment of this essential redemption of money did He, just every so often? If God ever did such a thing (which no veritable research corroborates to descend from any ostensible prophet), God nonetheless then would effectively have forbidden us to redeem our very own money to ourselves — which without redemption money cannot serve the only purpose we have in money. And yet even so, this so seldom forbidden redemption was only to occur, for some assumable reason, only every once in some magical week of years. Wow. Not only then is it far more likely such a proposition is the most peculiar invention of men — we further can understand the peculiar propositions only conceivable motives... for the ostensible forgiving of irreversible multiplication of *faux* debt only feigns the seeming benevolence of attending to the consequence of faux debt subject to unjustifiable interest, that the means of terminal dispossession itself can be preserved. Neither is it remarkable then that we see just such parallels as we do, in our very own time of terminal dispossession. Look around you. The very same idea is seeded everywhere — never to sustain the fact of singular solution, but instead to deny us that singular solution. In the end nonetheless, there is no reason or need for Jubilee in a proper economy and monetary system... for we can resolve the promissory obligations of our volition under the only monetary justice... whereas the corrupt proposition of Jubilee on the other hand only destroys the very redeemability upon which valid currency absolutely depends — while preserving the very crimes of the obfuscation which alone, and without their eradication, make the preposterous cycle of ostensible Jubilee the very appeal of anyone and everyone who would prefer we suffer the consequences again and again, only to sustain the crime which inevitably makes it impossible to service an irreversible escalation of faux debt. The proposition of such a Jubilee is instead to preserve the crime we were instead advised never to tolerate. mike montagne founder of PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™, original (1968) architect of mathematically perfected economy™, and principal author of the global amendment for mathematically perfected economy and absolute consensual representation™ (C) Copyright 2014 by mike montagne and PFMPE™.
Posted on: Thu, 03 Jul 2014 21:17:58 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015