#Justice4TBH Justice Mah Weng Kwai said this in his judgment: if Teoh Beng Hock had the intention to jump out of the window, he would have to climb on to the window sill and balance himself on the sill before leaping. In so doing Teoh Beng Hock would have had to hold on to the frame of the window or the window glass itself in which event his fingerprints would be left on the frame or the window glass. However, as we do know from the evidence there were no fingerprints left on the frame or glass save for “1 dragged fingerprint or mark on the glass”, which in any event could not be dusted for identification. In fact, Chief Inspector Mazli Jusoh the fingerprint expert said in evidence that if someone ‘pijak mesti ada kesan’ and that there was no ‘kesan tapak kasut’ near or within the vicinity of the window which meant that there was no evidence to suggest that Teoh Beng Hock had climbed onto the window sill himself. (page 25 of his judgment) So I wonder, on what basis the RCI come to the conclusion that Beng Hock had committed suicide?
Posted on: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 10:15:38 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015