Memo to the believing Mormon world: Concluding that the Books of Mormon and Abraham are not scientifically credible as translations of ancient records does not make one anti-Mormon. One can still believe that Mormons are good people, that the LDS church does good things, and one can even affirm anothers decision to remain active LDS -- whilst still acknowledging that: 1) there is literally not one credible non-LDS scientist on the planet who considers the Book of Mormon to be scientifically credible on any level (i.e., archaeologically, genetically, linguistically, geographically), and 2) that the Book of Abraham papyrus doesnt event mention Abraham....anywhere (according to the LDS churchs own position). If I am in error, please provide evidence. Most importantly, please stop referring to people as anti-Mormon simply because they are open/honest about their conclusions, based on their understanding of the scientific record.
Posted on: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 21:09:19 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015