Notice of Understanding andIntent And Claim of Right Dear, Addressed persons I, Basadar:Qadar-Shar fka Kevin Carlton George, the Claimant herein, present you with a Notice of Understanding and Intent. I am sending this letter out as a courtesy in order to avoid any furtherconfusion or potential conflict. I am now expanding the reach of my discourse in order to maintainmy honor and ensure maximum clarity between myself and all agents of government. Afterreceiving this letter, please expect a Notice of Understanding and Claim of Right in order to ensuremaximum clarity amongst all parties. As a peaceful man desiring to avoid conflict and live lawfullywith maximum freedom, I have recently been studying the history of the United States along withits legal system and have come to some very interesting conclusions. After reading various Actsand exploring the way language is used in those Acts, I have realized that “lawful” and “legal” arenot always the same. It also appears that all acts and statutes in US are only contracts based incommerce. Therefore I am now contacting the various government officials named above in thehopes that someone can either confirm or correct my understanding. If you do choose to respondwith corrections, I must insist that you do so within Fourteen (14) days of service of this letter, inwriting, via registered mail and provide proof of your claim, under oath or attestation with fullcommercial liability and penalty of perjury. A lack of response or response that does not containproof of my mistaken understanding, on a point-by-point basis, will be assumed to implyagreement with my understanding. Failure to dispute the claims made herein will result in anautomatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence. Now,specifically in Canada I understand that there is both a common law and statute lawtradition, which is interesting, because I also understand that a statute is a legislated rule of asociety, which has the force of law upon members of that society; a society being a fictional legalentity such as a corporation. I also understand that the Government of Canada is not a nation as I thought it was, occupying a geographical location, but instead merely a corporation with de-factoauthority, rather than lawful. This corporation can only make corporate/contract law that has theforce of law only upon its consenting members. From my research, the “law of the land,” is thepeaceful common law, which is not influenced by acts and statutes. Under common law, the rights,freedoms, and duties of private individuals have long been established and unlike statute law,common law has had a progression towards more freedom and personal responsibility rather thanless. Among the rights and freedoms understood by common law are such things as the rights tolife, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, property and use thereof, privacy, peace, and the ability totravel freely in public without harassment or intimidation. The obligations and duties of those livingunder common law are essentially to ensure that one does not infringe or allow others to infringeupon those unalienable rights and freedoms. I have also learned that the rights of a free spiritualbeing cannot be lawfully limited without consent, as that would imply slavery. Effectively, rights arenot bestowed upon one by another unless the first gives his/her consent, or the first is the lawfulproperty of the second. The very nature of the concept of consent is that it can only exist amongstequals with full disclosure and without coercion. I do not recall ever being sold or purchased as aslave, nor do I recall giving my free consent to be governed or represented by any governmentalagent, although at times I have been deceived and intimidated into submission. Although thevarious rights and freedoms are self-evident and unalienable, in order to be. In order for lawfulrepresentation to exist, there must be mutual consent, and that consent may be revoked for anyreason depending on the nature of a specific contract between the two parties. I am herebynotifying all who read this and any other interested parties that I have revoked my consent to begoverned by fictitious corporate entities with which I do not have a subsisting contract. I declarethat I am neither a child nor a slave, but a free man capable of administering my own affairs.Notice of Understanding and Intent And Claim of RightWhereas it is my understanding Canada of America is a common law jurisdiction, and,Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and, Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has beengiven the force of law, and,Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutualconsent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and,Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in Canada is a representative one, and,Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and,Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation norgovernance can exist, and,Whereas it is my understanding those who have a SSN (Social Security Number) are in factemployees of the federal government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the federalgovernment, and,Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one’s SSN, and,Whereas it is my understanding people in Canada of America have a right to revoke ordeny consent to be represented and thus governed, and, Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and,Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutoryrestrictions, obligations, and limitations, and, Whereas I, Basadar:Qadar-Shar am a Freeman-on-the-Land,and, Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breachthe peace, and, Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a licensemust itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and, Whereas as I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I donot see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially fromthose who claim limited liability,and, Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and,Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order toclaim authority or control over other parties, and, Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over thosewho are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allowsoulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and, Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay forthe use or enjoyment of it, and, Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the onesissued or any of its agencies creates no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and, Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and lawand those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking thelaw, and, Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with peace officers who have notobserved me breach the peace, and, Whereas permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor frombringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is notresponded to in the stated fashion and time, Therefore, be it now known to any and all concerned and affected parties, that I, Basadar:Qadar-Shar, a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent topeacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations and restrictions, and maintain all rightsat law to trade, exchange or barter . Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities’ standards and will in factsupport said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held byme is held under a claim of right. Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been servednotice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking thelaw, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in aproperly convened court de jure. Furthermore, I claim that the courts in Canada are de-facto and are in fact in theprofitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interestsand I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and Ido hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as hereinstated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act. Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, governmentprincipals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS PER HOUR or portionthereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulatedand TWO THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported,incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarizedconsent. Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEESCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests,directly or by proxy in any way. Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentiallycriminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice systemparticipants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawfulcounterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed andestablished rights and freedoms. Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is serviceupon both. Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an openforum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion andnegotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims mustrespond appropriately within Fourteen (14) days of service of notice of this action. Responses mustbe under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered inthe Notary Office herein provided no later than fourteen days from the date of original service asattested to by way of certificate of service. Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of chargesunder any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land, Basadar:Qadar-Shar.Place of claim of right: Brooklyn, New York: United States of AmericaDated: This seventh day of march in the year of our Lord two-thousand nineClaimant: Basadar :Qadar-Shar fka Kevin Carlton:GeorgeNotary Public: ____________________________Use of a Notary is for attestation and verification purposes only and does not constitute a change instatus or entrance or acceptance of foreign jurisdiction.
Posted on: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 02:32:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015