ORIENTATION # 721 : DRASTIC INQUIRY ABOUT LOVE __________________________________________ In regard of love: Lets keep it mathematically simple : 1) Whatever love is in terms of sensation (and not at all in terms new definition), such sensation can be wholly comprehended exclusively by a mind who totally understand itself. 2) Does our mind fully understand itself ? The answer is not: our mind is mostly confused.. everlastingly mistaking a possible total psychological understanding ... with reasons to find out love, no matter if in your god, your illusions, your divine, your sacredness you yourself invented or adopted (you were not born with the knowing of the divine or the sacredness), ..or just reasons to be loved and to love (sometimes at every cost) ...whether through the act of searching for the illusory soul mate whatsoever, or the absolutely unintelligent conceptualization of universal love (can we detect some form of love in the contemplation of two galaxies colliding with each other therefore in the act of eliminating trillions of forms of life and beautiful planets ?).. 3) It is clear, even historically, that man mistakes life with love as a form of escapism from the whole comprehension of life itself, which is supposed to be done first of allby a radical intimate psychological self-inquiry and self-observation.. 4) Because of this lack of self-observation, man loses his own self-orientation then love becomes important, extremely important as a tool aimed to establish an illusory solution to cover up our ancestral confusion. 5) How can possibly a confused mind love ? A confused mind can only translate its own sensation (called love) into verbalized conceptualizations, into ideals,into religious macro values, common senses, romantical moralities .. up to the spiritual nonsenses pettily aimed to justify life through, as easy as miserably idiotic, macro concepts of nothingness such as all is infinite love and so on: The universe is hyper-complicated, the mind is very very very complex, this make the sensation we call love super complicated as well... Said that, then what happened exactly to the human intelligence that love became such an easy confabulation to adopt and follow blindly ? Only the fool would say that a sensation if very simple.. The same unintelligent mind that repeats constantly follow your heart ...cause it has nothing else to think and to say.. Is this love ? Is this the way to intelligently understand a sensation ? Surely not .. and thats the very reason why love has been the most misunderstood conceptualization ever created ... always creating disasters over disasters .. misunderstandings and insanities married with absurdities of all kinds .. all along the human history ... Look at the holy inquisition: do you know what the holy inquisition is ? It is because of love toward jesus that they tortured and killed millions... Look at the love one has for his country and therefore he is ready to become a japanese kamikaze.. Look at those people who claim to love unconditionally and the nonsense of their wow statement is directly proportional with the level of pettiness they hold ... : Ask to yourself a simple question: Can there be love, the sensation I mean (which has no name and no definition of any kind , as well: no acts of clinging to this and that no matter if stupidly to the divine whatsoever or by belonging to what one knows because of his past)... can there be love.. if ones intelligence is not fully clear ? Think about these things ... 6) How can there be love with no messy results, or just the hebetude typical of the new age.. if there there is not absolutely free intelligence .. liberated from all conditionings ? Each time you palpitate because of your willingness to say something about love... please ask to yourself the question above ... here repeated in a different way : When it comes to think about love.. not the definition, but rather about the anonymous sensation (never name a feeling)... then whats important the most ? Love ? Or intelligence ? Isnt this a absolutely relevant question ? But the answer must be found inwardly ... out of the regime of rhetorical thinking .. If you believe that love is more important than intelligence .. then you are in a big problem.. the same problem that has been always around.. all along the history of human intelligence .. which, because of love, has barely or not at all evolved .. bringing to us, up to nowadays, the same fears, the same confusion and the same stupidities we had 10.000 years ago and 10.000 years before ... Call the speaker annoying if you will .. but the speaker/writer is irrelevant: look at the contents, thats reality, actuality, history and our future.. find out for yourself before opening your mouth with no use of the brain (you were born intelligent, not as a rhetorical parrot).. and think about these things .. 4.000.000 books have been written about love.. Who wants to read or to write another book about love ? Lets write the last one right here right now : it simple : Love is : a totally free mind ! : end of the book, just one single page.. end of the deal .. now hopefully we can proceed with our psychological r-evolution..:-) ______________________________________ endoffear.weebly/ jessicamystic
Posted on: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 02:33:01 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015