Okay, now the NYTimes a newspaper staffed by supposedly intelligent? People said that fewer full time workers is a good? thing. For who? the worker having no place to live after having his hours cut, not being able to pay bills is a good thing, liberating, the paper said, being liberated out of house and home is a good thing. What the? A country that pays its bills with taxes, and needs lots of full time workers making full time money to pay full time taxes. But now our country is liberated? Out of that tax revenue, and thats a flipping good thing. Are you folks high? This is most certainly a bad thing, and you politicians that voted for this train wreck, well that retirement plan is funded by tax revenue, and by lowering the tax revenue, you just threw a monkey wrench right into your golden retirement plans, baby, if we the tax payers arent working those good full time hours, you politician folks might not get paid that cushy retirement check, cause Uncle Sam is gonna be a broke ass third world country, we will be hurting not paying taxes, my comfort will be the idea of you politicians actually having to work a job, yourselves, you politicians deserve it
Posted on: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:45:32 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015