POLICE OFFICERS ARE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD BECAUSE THEY POSSESS - TopicsExpress



          

POLICE OFFICERS ARE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD BECAUSE THEY POSSESS A GREAT DEAL OF AUTHORITY AND HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO END HUMAN LIFE. PROSECUTORS ARE HELD TO A HIGHER STANDARD BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE DUTY TO PROSECUTE ONLY THOSE THEY REASONABLY BELIEVE TO GE GUILTY BASED ON THE AVAILABLE EVIDENCE AFTER EVIDENCE THAT DID NOT PASS THE RULES SET FORTH BY THE TENANTS OF THE EXCLUSIONSARY RULE has been culled out. Our judges and court system decide the application of the rules. CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS DO NOT HAVE THE BURDEN OR RESPONSIBILTY OF DEFENDING THE INNOCENT THEY ARE CHARGED WITH THE DUTY OF USING THE SAFEGUARDS SET FORTH BY A HOST OF PRECEDENTS FROM PASSED MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS. IN FEDERAL CRIMINAL TRIALS THE PROSECUTION HAS THE OPTION OF SPLITTING THE TIME ALOTTED FOR THE CLOSING ARUGUMENTS MADE TO THE JURY. PRESENTING THE LAST WORD IN THE ARGUMENT DOES SEEM TO GIVE THE PROSECUTOR A SIGNIFICANT ADVANTAGE TO ACHIEVE A CONVICTION. THE LAWS THAT DEFINE THE USE OF LETHAL FORCE ALLOWABLE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT WHO IS IN FEAR FOR LOSING HIS OR HER LIFE IS DIFFERENT THAN THAT GOVERNING THE CITIZEN WHO IS NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN THE COURSE OF PERFORMING HIS OR HER DUTY. THE TREATMENT OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO TAKES A CITIZENS LIFE IS DIFFERENT THAN THE TREATMENT OF A NON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER WHO TAKE ANOTHER HUMAN BEINGS LIFE. THE BENEFICIAL TREATMENT OF THE OFFICER IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT HE HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY TO ENFORCE THE LAWS OF THE STATE AND THE UNNITED STATES GOVERNMENT UNDER SOME CIRCUMSTANCES. THE RESPONSIBILITY OF ENFORCING THE EXISTING LAWS ALSO APPLIES TO CITY ORDINANCES AS DEFINED BY THE JURISDICTION IN WHICH HE OR SHE WORKS AS AN OFFICER. iT IS MY CONTENTION THAT THE INCREASED RESPONSIBILITY OF A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IS THE BASIS THAT THE LEGAL SYSTEM GIVES THE MENTIONED BENEFIT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS. JUSTICE FOR ALL IS THE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS AS DEFINED BY OUR LEGAL SYSTEM AND JURIST WHO JUDGE THE LEGITAMACY OF EACH AND EVERY ASPECT OF A LEGAL PROCEEDING. JUSTICE FOR ALL CAN ONLY BE ACHIEVED BY APPLYING THE LAW AS IT IS WRITTEN AND DEFINED BY THE SYSTEM WE ALL HAVE TO LIVE BY AS CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES. THE DECISION TO PROSECUTE DARREN WILSON IS TO BE MADE BY THE GRAND JURY THAT HAS THE BENEFIT OF VIEWING ALL OF THE EVIDENCE NOT JUST THE EVIDENCE AFTER THE DEFENSE FILES THE MOTIONS FOR SUPPRESSION. ALL OF THE EVIDENCE REPRESENTS THE TRUTH AND THE ENTIRE TRUTH OF WHAT HAPPENED BENEFITS THE CUASE OF THOSE WHO SUPPORT CHARGES BEING FILED AGAINST DARREN WILSON. A TRIAL WOULD BENEFIT DARREN WILSON IN SO FAR AS BEING FOUND NOT GUILTY WHICH WOULD NOT MEAN THAT HE IS INNOCENT AS SHOWN BY ALL OF THE EVIDENCE. HOLDING A TRIAL FOR CHARGES THAT FAIL TO MEET THE MINIMUM TEST FOR ACHIEVING A CONVICTION WOULD BE A MISUSE OF THE AUTHORITY AND THE POWER THAT PROSECUTOR BOB McCullough HAS BEEN ENTRUSTED WITH BY THE CITIZENS OF ST LOUIS COUNTY, ALL OF THE CITIZENS. QUESTION: Would the outrage be severe or nearly as severe if WiLSON had brown skin not white skin. If color should not matter in regard to who is shot by law enforcement then it seems a paradox that it should matter in regards to the color of the shooters skin. Working towards a system where color does not matter as much as it does in the treatment of a citizen includes the need to minimize the misuse of skin color in regards to how the law is applied. Dorian Johnson may have been faced with the possibility of being charged with Felony murder under our state statute which may have encouraged him to change his initial statement to reflect the truth of what occurred. His initial statement to the public via the press does have some significant inconsistencies or lapses in regard to the physical evidence showing Brown grabbing the gun of Wilson. No argument on my part, just he basis for my reasoning and the clarification of the law as it applies to law enforcement not being exactly the same as how the law is applied to the citizen. It is the law and Justice is the result of applying the law and the truth does matter. Period.
Posted on: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 01:20:56 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015