Perimeters & parentheses of science??? Theory = a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained (science, duh). You want me to believe that this mysterious know-it-all created all, including humans, to put them through trails proving they believe and hand them a set of rules to break only to KNOW which ones would be saved and which will not... your god seems cruel - that could not be a perfect entity. Also, I love his take on thermodynamics which he was COMPLETELY wrong about but for the rest of us, here it is in laymens terms: There are 4 laws to thermodynamics, and they are some of the most important laws in all of physics. The laws are as follows Zeroth law of thermodynamics - If two thermodynamic systems are each in thermal equilibrium with a third, then they are in thermal equilibrium with each other. First law of thermodynamics - Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. It can only change forms. In any process, the total energy of the universe remains the same. For a thermodynamic cycle the net heat supplied to the system equals the net work done by the system. Second law of thermodynamics - The entropy of an isolated system not in equilibrium will tend to increase over time, approaching a maximum value at equilibrium. Third law of thermodynamics - As temperature approaches absolute zero, the entropy of a system approaches a constant minimum. This genius also points out that it would take great faith to believe in the theory of evolution & science... that is the BASES of all science: faith & beliefs. Probably as much as it takes to believe in some zombie who came back to life to tell us we should be grateful because his dad killed him KNOWING it would pay off human debt for a sin committed waaaaaaayyyyy before he was even created?!?! uh, thanks? Lastly, to compare the eons of time & all that might have been produced as a result of combining time with matter and space to that of a story concocted by a sect of ruling peoples to keep larger societies in line... far, far reaching. Place an apple on the counter for a few months and tell me it does not change, then you can claim that an intelligent design just poofd it into its new form. Believing in tangent & physical evidence which coincides with the theory of evolution as opposed to go off on a story written by many human hands then butchered with each new translation (1000s of translations) over many hundreds of moons... hmmm. Yeah, I think Ill stick to atheism but thanks for your desperate reach. This dude is obviously a sensationalist & an evangelist who NEEDS you to believe him so he wont be wrong. In science, being wrong only produces more possibility whereas religion, is a SET of laws that according to its own doctrine, cannot be changed, yet its practitioners change it every day. Sorry buddy, youre passionate rant holds no water, NATURALLY.
Posted on: Sat, 28 Jun 2014 14:19:00 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015