Perverting and corrupting the genuine meaning of HUMAN RIGHTS. ONLY in the UK would these utter mad men even be listened to by any Court of Law! ONLY in the UK are there Solicitors and Barristers willing to attempt these despicable methods of perverting and corrupting the genuine meaning of HUMAN RIGHTS! ONLY in the UK are these sorts of legal minds allowed to walk the streets without members of Public they BETRAY exercising their Human Right to give them a sound thrashing for their sickening need for Judas’ silver! dontvotelabour, landofthedoomed, What human rights? He decided to plot to kill people then he gave up his human rights. Maybe someone should ask him where his victims’ human rights are. So what’s this all about? It’s all about this. And it’s maddening that anyone like this should even be heard by a court. Any court. I don’t think he’ll go free. The courts may reject hearing him. Who knows? And that question is a problem. Who knows? This filthy turd, this garbage in human form should not even be breathing. This is another example of the west just not doing what it could, to protect itself. Oh btw ... the video this vermin is referring to, is the one HE MADE! Al-Qaeda liquid bomb plotter asks European court to free him - because publicity over ‘suicide video’ infringed his human rights · Abdulla Ahmed Ali developed a home-made hydrogen peroxide bomb that could be disguised as a soft drink and taken aboard a plane · Claims publicity before his trial would have prejudiced a jury’s decision and has appealed to European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg · Court does not hold power to quash conviction, but a ruling in his favour could lead to a fresh appeal in British courts · Judges must establish whether he had a ‘fair trial by an impartial tribunal’ as required under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights By Lizzie Edmonds The mastermind behind the ‘liquid bomb plot’, one of the most deadly terrorist plans ever to be unearthed in Britain, is making a bid to have his conviction overturned on human rights grounds. Abdulla Ahmed Ali developed a home-made hydrogen peroxide bomb that could be disguised as a soft drink and taken on board a plane. He and a group of associates planned to take the bombs aboard seven flights. The discovery of his suicide plan in 2006 led to urgent changes to international restrictions on carrying fluids on to planes. However, the al-Qaeda terrorist now claims his human rights were infringed by publicity before he was convicted for life for conspiracy to murder - and has appealed to the European Court of Human Rights. He argues that the jury would have been prejudiced by coverage of a previous trial. Although the Strasbourg court does not hold the power to quash the conviction, it would be extremely problematic for the Government if they ruled in the terrorist’s favour. If Ali wins his case it would allow him and fellow plotters to begin an attempt in British to have their convictions quashed, using the European ruling to convince judges that their convictions were not fair. Speaking to The Sunday Telegraph, Chris Grayling, the Justice Secretary, said the case highlighted why there was an urgent need for reform to human rights laws. He also the case was evidence that the Strasbourg court was increasingly willing to interfere in Britain’s justice system. ‘This yet a further example of why things cannot go on as they are’, he said. ‘It is unacceptable to have a situation in which claims to the European Court of Human Rights are actually being used to undermine our justice system.
Posted on: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 22:45:42 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015