Plasticity versus Tolerance: They got more flexible, but HOW, dammit, HOW?! Marshall et al. (see previous post) is a decent and recent example of evidence that stretching can improve flexibility. When subjects were stretched with the same force (torque) applied, pushed to the same level of discomfort, they could go 20% farther. Not bad! So we know something changed! But was is it a “plastic” deformation in the tissue? Or a neurological change in tolerance for stretch? Despite extensive evidence against physical change, Team Plasticity remains large and devout: many professionals still believe that tissues adapt structurally to stretching, and Marshall et al is a good example. The authors followed their data into an glaring overinterpretation in favour of plasticity. Because range increased, but pain at the end of the range did not, they unwisely concluded that a change in tolerance was probably not a factor. But stretching farther without hurting more could certainly mean an increase in tolerance! Although it wasn’t measured, it’s safe to assume the subjects’ pain would have been less if stretched only to the end of their original range. The experiment was simply agnostic on the “how” question. It demonstrated only an increase in extensibility, not whether it was due to neural or structural adaptations. The pro-plastic opinion was just a classic example of confirmation bias at work. ~ Paul Ingraham, SaveYourself.ca Marshall et al., Journal of Science & Medicine in Sport, 2011 saveyourself.ca/bibliography.php?marshall2011 This post on SaveYourself.ca: saveyourself.ca/microblog/plasticity-versus-tolerance.html
Posted on: Wed, 28 May 2014 19:16:41 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015