Re: Natives aspire to receive a royalty on LNG. Mr. Hagar’s LNG article is vague. It is equally incoherent as is the idea of playing with Satan, that Dragon, that fiery attraction. Ask first, how has the belief in consumerism and resource exploitation panned out? For the identical language is spoken now, that great benefit looms. The LNG issue comes before the public with relative short notice, with signs expressing active opposition dotting lawns, put there by people claiming a species of entitlement to dissent against the business communitys and most probable government agenda of financial action around the gas likely to inflict some damage and loss and of certain injury harm and eventual damage to coming generation even by the sheer waste now of energy required later. There is a climate like a religious fervour sifting around this LNGas, that is further clouded by the assumed dogma that this product must be extracted from the Earth in response to the conceded entitlement of a schedule of stakeholders who are fatuously described as the public, workers, businesses, towns and Mayors and school children and the indigent, whose interests cannot help but be served by the planned extraction, and transhipments and by some local consumption of this particular commodity, although there appears to be a large demand by Asia for the product and that raises the matter of what use they intend for the fuel and how it may come to pass that we may be asked, or forced, to submit to their majority demands and their now adopted industrial strategy. Remember, States are inclined to interpret their interests as their entitlements when they become dominant in the economy. For this reason it is error to sdvsnce the premise of the rights of nations as against the emperors claim and right and as aganst the world population as a single polity, no longer divided and kept opposed. Ultimately however, since Western Culture is based on the religion of money, only a secretive minority has effective control of this development at this stage, so they are virtually the dread red dragon of Revelation 12 and deserve our spite for the damage they have done and further intend. We, in our family and Indian Band, for these reasons and for other concerns, demand a more basic discussion about whether these flammable and water wasting gases and oils should be extracted at all, at this time, if ever, meeting within our own forums, the Potlatch, in which the several proponents of such risky and relatively short-term industry can advance their beliefs about their intentions, in light of hearing about the obvious dangers and long term irrevocable harm such as now is the condition of the land after a century of the same Resource based Religion of extracting fuels. If it is deemed useful and safe to take the gas from the ground then further details will fall into place around whose use takes priority in ownership of the product and just what constitutes safety. Is it acceptable to destroy the planet in order to fund a consumer culture? That may well constitute a serious social crime and at the very least is a most serious mischief, harmful to all. It is simply a reckless act to touch the fount of fire. The eventual benefits of such resources naturally belong to the most senior and most adjacent local of the stakeholders because it is they, the natives and pioneer families, and only slightly less the immigrants, who have to be asked to contribute to the future by accepting all of the local threat to their life and to the indigenous livelihood, that these actions portend. Man certainly cannot continue to damage the global or the local biosphere. Cities and state citizens and investors interests fall to the nether and lowest end of the list of priorities for benefits, since the State and the monetary culture behind cities, are mere processes that ultimately serve to impose martial law and purport to offer majority rule. Occupants of cities extract an inequitable part of the resource compared to the inhabitants of the country. Potlatch repairs this disparity. We contend on these several points and claims that Heaven weights authority over the land in favour of Jesus Christ and his Haida peers, as against Canada and the Province of British Columbia, as well as against all other Indians, in virtue of Section 35.1 CCAct 1982 and what is set out in the Supreme Court of Canada. It is time now, following the Maya star progression, to Imperialize the planet from the West, based on the Totem Pole culture and aboriginal entitlement to the land that is expressed in Potlatch. The Parliament of Canada is obligated to recognize and affirm that our family possesses and stands for the root of the Imperial Crown, being direct heirs of Eden who never were banished from that paradise as was the encestress of their culture, whom we rejected. We are entitled to consult others on our land and willing to be consulted by others as well. Failure to conform to the constitution stipulates cause for immediate impeachment of parliament as a whole and for a serious message to Queen Elizabeth about certain Spencer descendants, related to young Prince George, residing at Skidegate on Haida Gwaii that are significant to the Imperial Family. Her Majestys Prime Minister has bitten the Aryan apple to the very serious detriment of Canada and has inflicted a fatal wound on popular democracy’s sovereign aspiration, let alone the governments attempt to demonstrate capacity to comprehend and be the Crown. The final argument against current plans for our resources is that priority is attached to the most early clarification of the land title to these provinces and to Canada’s native land. Our title prevails in Canada by exceeding the bounds of the State of Canada in Alaska and Washington states, manifesting a more powerful possession of the land. We therefore re-name the Province of BC Kitsilano, excluding Haida Gwaii, A.D., for Aboriginal Dominia; the Imperial right (excluding Haida Gwaii as its own Kingdom) and we continue our claim of sovereign title against the Queen as now standing, without impugning the right of the Spencer line. The LNG issue has come before the public with short notice, with signs expressing opposition dotting lawns by claiming a species of entitlement to dissent against the business along with a very possible and most probable government agenda. There is religious fervour sifting around this LNGas, that is further clouded by the assumed dogma that this product must be extracted from the Earth in response to the conceded entitlement of a schedule of stakeholders who are fatuously described as the public, workers, businesses, towns and Mayors and school children and the indigent, whose interests cannot help[ but be served by the extraction, shipment and consumption of this particular commodity. The biblical reference mentioning of vials and vessels of oil has to be referenced. We, in our family and our Indian Band, call for a more basic discussion about whether these flammable and water wasting gases and oils should be extracted at all, at this time, if ever, in our own forums, duly held Potlatches, in which the proponents of such risky and relatively short term industry can advance their beliefs about their intentions in light of the obvious dangers and long term irrevocable harm such as now is the condition of the land after a century of the same Resource based Religion of extracting fuels. If it is deemed useful and safe to take any gas or oil from the ground then further details will fall into place around whose use takes priority and what constitutes safety. Distribution of Benefits of such resources belong to the most senior and most local of the stakeholders because it is they, the natives and pioneer families who are asked to contribute to the future by accepting the local threat to their life and indigenous livelihood that these actions portend. Cities and state citizens and investors interests fall to the nether and lowest end of the list of priorities for benefits, since the State and the monetary culture behind cities, serve to impose martial law and majority rule on the natural ruling class and the Imperial family. We contend that Heaven weights authority over the land in favour of Jesus Christ and his Haida peers so that the right equity will be settled on the most entitled and needful and thus this assertion is the declaration of Christ against the Dragon. It is time now, following the Maya star progression, to Imperialize the planet from the West, based on the totem Pole culture and aboriginal entitlement. The Parliament of Canada must recognize and affirm that our family possesses and stands for the root of the Imperial Crown, the heirs of Eden, who were never banished from that paradise. We are entitled to consult others on our land and willing to consult all others as well. Failure to conform to the constitution stipulates cause for immediate impeachment of parliament as a whole and for a serious message to Queen Elizabeth about certain Spencer descendants, related to youg Prince George, residing at Skidegate on Haida Gwaii that are significant to the Imperial Family. Her Prime Minister has bitten the Aryan apple to serious detriment of Canada and inflicted a fatal wound on popular democracy’s claim to be sovereign, let alone to comprehend the Crown. The final argument against the current plans for our resources is that priority is attached to the most early clarification of the land title to these provinces and to Canada’s native land. Cest fini. . vancouversun/technology/First+Nations+fear+being+windfall/9090927/story.html
Posted on: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 03:49:44 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015