Read this on THE OPEN LOOP, very important. . . This is part of - TopicsExpress



          

Read this on THE OPEN LOOP, very important. . . This is part of a book written by Dr. Daniel Goleman, et. al, entitled, PRIMAL LEADERSHIP. In this presentation, the authors imply endorsement of evolution. This section of the book is "food for thought" especially in light of our position of transference. Please read and apply where Biblically permitted. AY. A quote from the kindle version, see below: The Open Loop The reason a leader’s manner—not just what he does, but how he does it—matters so much lies in the design of the human brain: what scientists have begun to call the open-loop nature of the limbic system, our emotional centers. A closed-loop system such as the circulatory system is self-regulating; what’s happening in the circulatory system of others around us does not impact our own system. An open-loop system depends largely on external sources to manage itself. In other words, we rely on connections with other people for our own emotional stability. The open-loop limbic system was a winning design in evolution, no doubt, because it allows people to come to one another’s emotional rescue—enabling, for example, a mother to soothe her crying infant, or a lookout in a primate band to signal an instant alarm when he perceives a threat. Despite the veneer of our advanced civilization, the open-loop principle still holds. Research in intensive care units has shown that the comforting presence of another person not only lowers the patient’s blood pressure, but also slows the secretion of fatty acids that block arteries. 2 More dramatically, whereas three or more incidents of intense stress within a year (say, serious financial trouble, being fired, or a divorce) triple the death rate in socially isolated middle-aged men, they have no impact whatsoever on the death rate of men who cultivate many close relationships. 3 Scientists describe the open loop as “interpersonal limbic regulation,” whereby one person transmits signals that can alter hormone levels, cardiovascular function, sleep rhythms, and even immune function inside the body of another. 4 That’s how couples who are in love are able to trigger in one another’s brains surges of oxytocin, which creates a pleasant, affectionate feeling. But in all aspects of social life, not just love relationships, our physiologies intermingle, our emotions automatically shifting into the register of the person we’re with. The open-loop design of the limbic system means that other people can change our very physiology—and so our emotions. Even though the open loop is so much a part of our lives, we usually don’t notice the process itself. Scientists have captured this attunement of emotions in the laboratory by measuring the physiology—such as heart rate—of two people as they have a good conversation. As the conversation begins, their bodies each operate at different rhythms. But by the end of a simple fifteen-minute conversation, their physiological profiles look remarkably similar—a phenomenon called mirroring. This entrainment occurs strongly during the downward spiral of a conflict, when anger and hurt reverberate, but also goes on more subtly during pleasant interactions. 5 It happens hardly at all during an emotionally neutral discussion. Researchers have seen again and again how emotions spread irresistibly in this way whenever people are near one another, even when the contact is completely nonverbal. For example, when three strangers sit facing each other in silence for a minute or two, the one who is most emotionally expressive transmits his or her mood to the other two—without speaking a single word. 6 The same effect holds in the office, boardroom, or shop floor; people in groups at work inevitably “catch” feelings from one another, sharing everything from jealousy and envy to angst or euphoria. The more cohesive the group, the stronger the sharing of moods, emotional history, and even hot buttons. 7 In seventy work teams across diverse industries, for instance, members who sat in meetings together ended up sharing moods—either good or bad—within two hours. 8 Nurses, and even accountants, who monitored their moods over weeks or every few hours as they worked together showed emotions that tracked together—and the group’s shared moods were largely independent of the hassles they shared. 9 Studies of professional sports teams reveal similar results: Quite apart from the ups and downs of a team’s standing, its players tend to synchronize their moods over a period of days and weeks. Goleman, Daniel; Boyatzis, Richard; McKee, Annie (2013-07-23). Primal Leadership, With a New Preface by the Authors: Unleashing the Power of Emotional Intelligence (Kindle Locations 263-271). Harvard Business Review Press. Kindle Edition.
Posted on: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 22:12:31 +0000

Trending Topics



ttext" style="margin-left:0px; min-height:30px;"> Andy Milczarek Theresa Flood Joseph Zwalinski @ Joseph Lombardo @
1Therefore, since we have been justified through faith, we have
Time A customer will commonly ask how long an engraving
A Message From Dr. ZAKIR NAIK: Dear all Muslim Brothers
Q What types of mental health problems are there? A From
Deseas comprar en amazon o ebay somos la unica empresa que te
Excursion 4 jours au sud tunisien le 14-15-16-17 Novembre
O movimento grevista perdeu o foco principal, pela primeira vez,

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015