SCHADENFRAUD By Dr Martin Roberts, 30th April 2014. According to Tracey Kandohla (Daily Mirror, 25 April), former GP Kate has said: There is nothing to suggest Madeleine is not alive. She has also said: Madeleine is still alive until someone proves otherwise. As has been pointed out on several previous occasions, it is not actually necessary to prove Madeleine is dead (or not still alive) by revealing her corpse. It can be done indirectly by proving that she was not abducted (see: Theres nothing to say shes not out there alive – McCannfiles, 27.6.09). Given that condition, there can be only one answer to Gerry McCanns outburst, Where is the child? Telekinesis is not, Im afraid, an option in this case. Prior to the first of DCI Andy Redwoods revelation moments it could be (and indeed was) established that no abductor could possibly have exited the McCanns apartment at a time coincident with Jane Tanners so-called sighting (see: No Way Out and No Way Out At All – McCannfiles, 8.7.13 and 13.7.13). Despite (or perhaps because of) the obviously contrived emergence of an innocent parent portering their own daughter around the streets of Praia da Luz at the time, the McCanns remain of the view that this is not whom Jane Tanner saw on the night of May 3rd, raising the possibility of there having been no end of transient child bearers in the vicinity that night, like a Pierce Brosnan scene from the re-make of The Thomas Crown Affair. Recent personal experience has confirmed two things in particular: that the introduction of an unverifiable third-party into the account of a crime is a gambit as old as Methuselah and, despite jurors being cautioned against speculation, phrases such as could have, might have etc. are as irresistible as bananas are to monkeys. (Their use in deliberation - the phrases not the bananas - should be banned). Nevertheless, in the context of the McCanns account of Madeleines abduction they are rife, which would leave any prosecuting counsel the task of discounting limitless flights of imagination before they could address the most probable cause or sequence of events. So now how do we prove Madeleine was not abducted? Perhaps by focussing on what a child abduction is, or isnt. Both parents, Kate McCann especially, have expressed remorse at not having been present at that minute, when it happened. Needless to say, had they been in attendance at the time then it should not have happened at all. Taking things at face value, it is perfectly obvious that the McCanns would not have stood back while their daughter was abducted by a stranger. No parent would do so (unless faced with Sophies Choice perhaps). Hence, if the McCanns were seen to have been tacit accomplices to the act of Madeleines removal from apartment 5A the Ocean Club, they will not have been complicit in abduction, but something else entirely. Either way they would have harboured some fore-knowledge of the event. And thats the rub. They did exhibit foreknowledge, which means (a) the event in question was not abduction as commonly understood and (b) they knew what it was, just as well as they knew what it wasnt. In the words of an anonymous lawyer, repeated for emphasis by Kate McCann in her book madeleine, One coincidence, two coincidences - maybe theyre still coincidences. Any more than that and it stops being coincidence. Coincidentally Kate McCann experienced a sudden aversion to own her camera, following her last photograph of daughter Madeleine, eight hours before she was found to be missing. Coincidentally, Gerry McCanns receipt of regular text messages, and his predictable recourse to voicemail thereafter (a daily routine associated with the aftermath of Madeleines disappearance), was a behaviour he exhibited on May 2nd – over twenty four hours before Madeleine was found to be missing. Coincidentally, a McCann family member photographed a subject of unique relevance to the search for their missing daughter before she was discovered missing. Thats three coincidences where, according to no less an authority than Kate McCann herself, the occurrence of more than two means none of them can be considered chance events (as theres no means of identifying the one that might be). If Madeleine McCann was not abducted then she is dead. She was not abducted. She is therefore dead, and has been for seven years, since before the establishment of Madeleines Fund by her parents, who did not ask for money at first but very quickly set up a way of dealing with it that traded on the false premise of the childs unexplained disappearance, and continues to do so.
Posted on: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 21:32:48 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015