SEZ ME....the good news....we are not taking this lightly. Obama & - TopicsExpress



          

SEZ ME....the good news....we are not taking this lightly. Obama & others being called outBarack Obama has a long history of omitting references to God, such as his repeated omission of endowed by our Creator when referencing the Declaration of Independence. So what is Obamas overarching objective? Under the pretense of religious tolerance, Barack Obamas administration has been quietly advancing his mandate to remove all expressions or manifestations of faith from government forums -- excepting Islam. This eradication serves the Lefts strategic objective of replacing God-given Rule of Law with the rule of men -- because the former is predicated on the principle of Liberty endowed by our Creator, while the latter asserts that Liberty is the gift of potentates and presidents. Obamas administrators are constantly endeavoring to drive wedges between Liberty and its inherent foundational endowment. Most notably, he has done this in those spheres where he can exercise power and influence without legislative and judicial precedents -- such as our military. As commander in chief, Obama has certainly succeeded in suppressing religious expression by uniformed Patriots in our military service branches. However, his subversion of faith expression in the military is not going without objection. For example, last year The Patriot uncovered what appears to be a legal setup by Obamas DoD civilian administrators and their surrogates, which has the potential to force the removal of so help me God from all military oaths. That strategic ploy starts with the 2011 removal of those words from officer, enlisted and cadet oaths at the Air Force Academy. Three weeks ago, we published a detailed account of that strategy. This week, in response to that column, 28 members of Congress issued an official letter of inquiry to the Superintendent of the Air Force Academy asking for a detailed explanation as to why [they omitted] so help me God from these oaths, despite the fact that the phrase is used in the very statutory language of the United States Code, and was part of the military oath drafted by the Founders themselves. (A Fox News report notes the AFAs Public Affairs Office claimed yesterday, It was an editorial oversight, however, a Freedom of Information Act request will be filed tomorrow in an effort to determine if anyone outside the AFA had a hand in the alteration of oaths.)
Posted on: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:32:00 +0000

Trending Topics



>

Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015