Silver quacks, charlatans often shameless charlatans working for money. BEWARE OF MISLEADING THE SICK this is too serious, and can be criminal.This is the man to whom Sircus refers to claim scientific respectability for his ideas! Yet it is enough for Sircus to conclude: It really is hard to understand how the New York Times piece failed to mention any of these other important factors about cancer. We all have reason to distrust the field of oncology and medical science itself. Both consistently demonstrate criminal ignorance when it comes to cancer, what causes it, how to prevent it, and what to do about it when one gets it. That’s the message of quacks. They want to convince you that doctors and scientists don’t know anything about cancer, that their incomplete understanding of the utter complexity of cancer is due to ideology and belief, not evidence. More importantly, they want you to believe in a view of cancer that is simple, neat, and, although sometimes based on a grain of science misinterpreted, utterly wrong.
Posted on: Mon, 07 Oct 2013 23:28:46 +0000
Trending Topics
© 2015