THE AGONGS SKEWED SPEECH IS NOT FAIR OR REGAL IF HE IS A KING WITH INTEGRITY. EC HAS BEEN ACTING ILLEGALLY FROM UNLAWFUL DELINEATION EXERCISES (GERRYMANDERING) TO COMMITTING FRAUD ABETTING BN TO WIN SINCE 1984. AS SUCH, NON OF THE VICTORIES BY BN IS LEGAL OR FAIR & TRANSPARENT. IF THE AGONG EXPECTS THE CITIZENS TO RESPECT THE OUTCOMES OF ALL THE TAINTED ELECTIONS, THEN HE IS GUILTY OF SUPPORTING A CRIMINAL REGIME. THATS VERY TRAGIC!!! QUOTE: I don’t think the Agong means that anyone is above the law or exempted from the law. Abdul Rashid’s claim that he did the redelineation in a proper way is a lie. What he did was illegal as it breached the 13th schedule of the Constitution. The three delineation exercises were carried out in 1984, 1994 and 2003. As these were carried out in violation of the direction of law as contained in schedule 13 of the Constitution, it follows that all the seven (7) General Elections since 1984, i.e. in 1986, 1990, 1995, 1999, 2004, 2008 and 2013 which were conducted based on the three unconstitutional delineation exercises, are also unlawful and as such void. In other words, although the BN won all those elections, they were not won with clean hands and the governments were formed unconstitutionally. But do any of those who won by playing foul games, as the referee (the EC) had put obstacles, even great obstacles in the path of the opposing teams, feel shame? The obstacles were the huge disparities in the number of voters in the different constituencies where the value of a vote in an opposition supporting area was reduced to a mere 10 percent or even less compared to a vote in a BN supporting area. A numbers game according to Abdul Rashid. Abdul Rashid’s confession has confirmed that the EC’s aggressively defended ‘independence’ was just a facade behind which was a government department answerable to the Prime Minister and charged with the responsibility of ensuring that the incumbent government remained in power election after election at any cost. To ensure this, the dwindling support had to be shored up with ‘correct’ delineation so that even with fewer votes, the BN would retain its two-thirds majority. This was the ‘vision’, ‘mission’ and duty of the EC. The art of gerrymandering was fined tuned to achieve this. First, the guiding formula in the Constitution was done away with. The Constitution initially stated that the difference in the number of voters in the various constituencies should not be more than 15%. This was later amended to 50%. After that it was fully blacked out, but what remained, and still remains in the 13th schedule, is the phrase that the number of voters in the different constituencies must be ‘approximately equal’ or in Malay ‘lebih kurang sama banyak’. UNQUOTE freemalaysiatoday/category/opinion/2013/12/02/illegitimacy-of-elections-since-1984/
Posted on: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 13:30:25 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015