!!! THE REAL TEMPLE OF BAAL..... Now !!! PAY ATTENTION !!! Because I Dont Give A Rats Ass What You Believe..... ALL ROMAN TEMPLES ARE DESIGNED THIS WAY...IF IT LOOKS EVEN CLOSE?....ITS A TEMPLE! Now For All Of Those Who Are Dealing With Temple Of Baal (Court) Issues..... HERES THE INFO! N.E.E.R. CORPS Research Division File#: 885500053 OPERATION: BAAL BOMB PURPOSE: If Forced To Enter One Of The Temples Of Baal...... DESTROY IT! ========================================================================================================================================= The Temples Of Baal Comprehending the beast with which you are dealing: The Court is the synagogue. The Temple of Baal, enforcing Babylonian Talmudic Law. The gate (or bar) is the veil -- {one enters to give sacrifice} The bench is the alter. The Black Robed Devil (the judge, administrative magistrate) is the high priest. --{vicarius dei} The Attorney [from Latin, attorn = to twist or turn] is the mediator. --{vicarius filii dei} The attorneys job is to move one into Roman Civil Law Jurisdiction and then quickly into Code and Rule Pleadings (Babylonian Law); remember he is a devil, too. Common Law is moot, since these are not Article Three courts. The bailiffs, clerks, and stenographers are the high priest servants. [They are there to accept and make record of the sacrifice.] If one enters the veil, one is there (and is expected) to give sacrifices. The fine is the wave offering; given to escape the threat of punishment. The court cost is the heave (tribute or gift) offering. How can one plea, if they do not UNDERstand the nature and cause of the charges? And if one is coerced to enter a plea, then that plea would have to be Non assumpsit, Without prejudice or “Non assumpsit under duress”, ...a plea by which Defendant avers that he did not undertake or promise as alleged by the plaintiff with no rights...waived. - Blacks Law 6th Ed. A better plea is Plea in Bar; however, one must know proper procedure well and how to set it up, to make this one really stick. If one enters plea of NOT GUILTY, one just might as well Plea Nolo Contrendere and get it over with; because one will loose anyway, since Not Guilty is a negative and it is impossible to prove a negative. The proper Plea would be a Plea of Innocence, which is a positive Plea, something which can be proven. However, Devils seldom allow Plea of Innocence. Remember, too, that these are courts of controversy. Learn ways and methods of avoiding controversy. These courts can, only, proceed in controversy. THE BELLIGERENT CLAIMANT The privilege against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It can not be retained by attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person. The one who is persuaded by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents rather than make a last ditch stand, simply loses the protection. Once he testifies to part, he has waived his right and must on cross examination or otherwise, testify as to the whole transaction. He must refuse to answer or produce, and test the matter in contempt proceedings, or by habeas corpus. -- United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 540 (District Court, M.D. PA. 1947) Once one hires an Attornor, and tell (testifies to) the Attornor (the enemys spy, an Officer of the Court) what has happened, the Attornor is required by law to share (Discovery) ALL evidence, which he obtains from his Client, with the Prosecutor. You have the right to remain silent, everything that you say (to any of these devils), CAN and WILL be used against YOU. Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436(1966). You would be wise to remain silent! Open mouth, insert foot! It is all a game, you are a pawn; and it has been prearranged for you to be the looser. Here is another good one, learn to answer a question with question. The master asks the question and the slave or servant answers. Remember what is quoted in paragraph above? If one answers a question, then never give them the answer they need or desire to gain jurisdiction to proceed. A good example: What is your name? My mother calls me son; or What is not correct try again! Learn to relax and have fun with these devils. Remember it is only a game; however, the joke is intended to be on you and at your expense. Learn to turn it around. If for some strange reason, one appears at Bar, then one must OBJECT to false statements made by Attorners at Bar and take EXCEPTION to false statements made by the Black Robed Devil. Failure to do so, is the waiver of your right. One NEVER objects to a statement by the Judge; take exception. Never APPEAR Pro se, Pro per or Pro anything, not even In propria persona. Never allow the Black Robed Devil to proclaim that you are there Pro se, Pro per or Pro anything. Always, ALWAYS, take EXCEPTION. One does not OBJECT to the Judges utterances, one takes EXCEPTION. One OBJECTS to the Prosecutors utterances. The Supreme Court in all of its ultimate wisdom made this ruling about those who APPEAR PRO SE: If there is any truth to the old proverb that [o]ne who is his own lawyer has a fool for a client, the Court by its opinion today now bestows a constitutional right on one to make a fool of himself. -- Faretta v California, 45 L Ed 2d 562, 592 (1975); also, found at last page of 422 US 806 and 95 S Ct 2525. To become a good belligerent claimant one needs to learn the Faretta Defense. The court nor the state does not have the right or the need to know ones, family, work, military, educational or religious background. All that is needed is that one is able to read, write and speak Americas English. Stop, volunteering information. The more information one volunteers the more these devil have to use against their victim. If one, out of necessity, must be present, then that presence, not appearance (things unseen are that which appear), should be sui juris by ones own Right or suæ potestate esse, the lord or master of the soil (self rule). The latter require knowledge of law to successfully use. To appear Pro Se or Pro anything is to accept a temporary appoint to the BAR, an acronym {British AristocRATic Regency or British Accreditation Registry}. Attorneys are Esquires. Esquires are apprentice Knights or Squires, who are practicing to become Squires and you pay for their practice. The Florida Bar as an example has 70,000 members; however, less than 2,800 members are Certified as Competent by the BAR. Do you really wish to be one of their guinea pigs? It should, also, be noted that the United States Supreme Court in ALL of its ultimate wisdom gave full immunity against both civil and criminal prosecution for perjury to Judges, Attorneys, Court Reporters, Stenographers, Law Enforcement Officers and Expert Witnesses, who testify for the STATE. They all have received an indulgence (permission or license) to BEAR FALSE WITNESS again YOU on behalf the State. Witnesses, such as Shrinks and Psychos, Sorcerers, receive a handsome amount of filthy lucre from to Court to lie against you, usually $500 to $5000 for their services. Read it and weep, Briscoe v LaHue, 460 US 325; 75 L Ed 2d 96, 103 S Ct 1108. Do you really want to play cards at their table? Expert witness means someone with a sheeps skin, who agrees with the party paying for their services. Welcome to the Fascist States of the United States, a British Crown Slave State or Plantation The Black Robed Devil (false accuser) is GOD (false deity, demon) [vicarius dei = substitute for deity; The Defense Attornor is the vicarius filii dei = substitute for the son of deity] All other officers are lesser deities. Therefore, stop using the term God. PERIOD. What part of the word stop do you not comprehend. God = Gaud (old English) = Gâd (Hebrew, SH #1408 and 1409) = the deity of good luck, good fortune, or troops; a deity of Babylon (The Masonic Luciferian Idol, which stand in New York Harbor). You ask any Black Robed Devil for your God-given rights and he will give them to you, maybe even 5 to 10 in one of their iron bar hotels or dungeons. Get the point! One is hung by their own tongue. They do not speak English. ALL Officers of the Court are Directors, Collectors or Representatives of the IRS. Federal Civil Rules, Rule 81(f). {The Supreme Court has arbitrarily remove this section, definition for “Officers of the Court”, from public view. They in their altiment wisdom decided that the public did not have the need to know. } Devil (SG #1228) = false accuser. idols = demons (SG #1140) = idols, false deities. The term GOD is not synonymous or interchangeable with the term deity, since GOD is the name of a false deity, a demon. Never does the term GOD mean or apply to Creator, NEVER! =================================================================================== Note: This Is The Most Powerful Script To Use In Court. It COUNTERS The UNUM SANCTUM And You VERBALLY Break The Spell....For Advanced Members Only. DO NOT USE THIS IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU ARE DOING!!! BREAKING THE SPELL & THE TRUST IN COURT....AND WINNING! Advanced Spell Breaker Script When the name of the trust is called for instance the “Jasmine Bolling” trust, you can say, “Are you saying that the trust we are now administering is called the Jasmine Bolling trust, your Honour?” The very mention of this knowledge will put the fear of God into the Judge. Don’t ever identify with the trust. “We can now establish that the trust is the name of a trust ‘Not a live man’, what is your next question your Honour?” Judge – “What is your name?” You must be very careful not to identify with the name of the trust because doing so makes us the trustee. What does this tell you about the Judge? If we know that the Judge is the trustee, then we know that the Judge is the name, but only for this particular constructive trust. As you will notice the Judge will become frustrated with the refusal to admit being the name, that they will issue a warrant and as soon as the man leaves they arrest him, how idiotic is that? They must feel foolish for admitting that John Doe is not in the Court, so I’m issuing a warrant for his arrest and as soon as the man they just admitted is not there to be arrested because he is there. They must get us to admit to being the name or they pay and we must not accept their coercion or we pay because the Judge is the Trustee, a precarious position. The best thing to say in that case is “Jasmine Bolling, is indeed in the court, your Honour.” Point to the Judge. “It is you, as trustee, you are Jasmine Bolling, today, aren’t you?” Why not? We are men and women, we are not persons. We have Dominium. During their frustration over not admitting to being a trust name, the trustee and/or the executor of the trust, we ought to ask who they are. “Before we go any further, I need who you are.” Address the Clerk of the court. “The trustee for the Cestui Que Vie trust owned by (New York/Queens/USA), are you the Cestui Que Vie trustee who has appointed this Judge, as a trustee for the Cestui Que Vie trust owned by (New York/Queens/USA)?” “Are you the Cestui Que Vie trustee who has appointed this Judge as Administrator and trustee of the constructive trust case (case number(s))?” “Did you also appoint the prosecutor as executor of this constructive trust?” Then point to the Judge. “So you are the trustee,”, then point to prosecutor, “you are the executor, are you not? And I am the beneficiary.” “So now we know who’s who, I as the beneficiary, I authorise you, to handle the accounting, and dissolve this constructive trust.” This is the power we have, dissolve this confession; I’m not into sin, I’m Divine. You are a spirit, they view you as a dead soul, lost at sea, minor, and incompetent and award of the state. “I now claim my body, so I am collapsing the Cestui Que Vie trust, which you have charged, as there is no value in it. You have committed fraud against all laws likely we will not get to hear that before the Judge will order. Case Dismissed!” Or even more likely – the prosecutor will say clutching his cheque book “We’ve withdrawn the charges.” There are 100,000s of people doing this. When you go to court, magistrates, you are under UCC law, this means you can only be fined. When the Judge has a recess he can change it to Canon Law or Maritime Admiralty Law, this can sentence you to prison. Admiralty Law is in play as you are then seen as lost at sea, you are officially stock on a port and they now have the power to store you in a warehouse (prison). If the Judge orders the Bailiffs to throw you out of court, then you can say “Don’t do that, you are dishonouring a court official.”, because the documents have been handed to the bailiff. If the Judge goes to leave the court for recess, then you must acknowledge – “The Judge has jumped ship, for the record, he has abandonded ship and I as Sovereignty in this court take control! Case closed! With Prejudice!” If the Judge says they are going to have a recess, you can decline it, as it is an offer. “Your Honour, I don’t consent.” If it is adjourned, then it stays in the same court, so just follow the above. Always relay that “I seek leave for an Interlocketary appeal, on a matter of law.” If you say this, the Judge will be reluctant to go to appeal because he will be losing out on commission. =========================================================================================================================================================== Intermediate Spell Breaker Script 1. Your honor I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows. I ask humbly for a remedy (the judge not actually being a judge and NOT desiring to provide you remedy will take a break and go into his chambers. When he returns he will have changed roles and will now be the captain of the maritime ship.) 2. Your honor I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows. I ask humbly for cure and maintenance. (He will now repeat the break form earlier not wanting to give you cure or remedy on his ship. Once he returns he will now have taken on the role of high priest of the temple .) 3. Your honor I wish to establish that I am a living being. The flesh lives and the blood flows. I have DOMINION and NOTHING stands between myself and the divine. =========================================================================================================================================================== Note: Use This To SHUT THEM DOWN! Get It Notarized & Authenticated. You Can Also Use This As A Spell Breaker Script In Court NOTICE TO COURT AND ALL COURT OFFICERS Since the Constitution cannot conflict with itself, the limited powers delegated to government by the Constitution can never supersede the powers of and Rights guaranteed in the Constitution to The American People. “Authority” is an extremely important word and concept. Government and the courts without Constitutional authority can conduct nothing lawful, and government has no authority to disparage your Rights. Keep “authority” in mind as you review the following statements and questions. CHALLENGES TO THE COURT BEFORE PROCEEDINGS CAN START 1. A. Your Honor and the prosecutor have taken oaths of office to support and uphold the Constitution of the united States of America and that of this state. Is that correct? B. Pursuant to your oaths, you are required to abide by those oaths, in the performance of your official duties, including those before this Honorable Court. Is that correct? 2. I, John Doe, hereby notify this Honorable Court that I am a living, breathing, natural-born American Citizen, with, and claiming, all Rights guaranteed to me in the federal and state Constitutions, and with my name properly spelled in upper and lower case letters, not as it appears on the court documents. Is there any objection to what I just stated? 3. This court abides by all the powers of and Rights guaranteed to American Citizens in the federal and state Constitutions, including due process of law. Is that correct? 4. I am presumed innocent of all aspects of the alleged charges, presumptions and assumptions in, by and of this court, unless proven guilty by a well-informed jury of my peers, beyond a reasonable doubt, based solely on verified evidence and proof. Is that correct? 5. A. “Proof” consists of verified and demonstrated e B. “Beyond a reasonable doubt” consists solely of decisions vidence, and not opinion, especially opinion unsupported by fact, law and evidence. Is that correct?and verdicts from a well-informed jury of my peers based entirely on proof that absolutely and conclusively confirms guilt, without any reservations or questions, whatsoever, from the jury. Is that correct? 6. Opinion from any witness or prosecuting attorney unsupported and unverified by fact, law and proven evidence is simply opinion, and opinion, as previously established, is not proof or factual evidence. Is that correct? 7. A. Since I am guaranteed a fair and impartial trial, how is that possible when you, the presiding judge, the prosecuting attorney and all the witnesses against me work for and are paid by the state that is the plaintiff in this case, and my opponent? In this situation, it is impossible for me to have a fair trial. Is that correct? B. Further, any data used against me is obtained from sources who, are also paid by the state, the same plaintiff against me. At minimum, conflict of interest takes place. 8. Since I am presumed innocent of the charges and all aspects, presumptions and assumptions of those charges and this court, I have challenged the jurisdiction of this court, which this court has not proven, on the public record. Therefore, since I am presumed innocent of all aspects of the charges and presumptions of the court, and since jurisdiction has not been proven, jurisdiction is simply a presumption of this court, of which I am presumed innocent. Furthermore, no official Oath of Office can be located anywhere, nor has one been put on the public record. Therefore, I move for dismissal of all charges and/or warrants for lack of jurisdiction. Pursuant to the foregoing, and to numerous federal and Supreme Court rulings, this case must be dismissed and any warrant recalled, with full prejudice, and I hereby move for dismissal of all charges and this case, with full prejudice. Failure to respond to this formal written notice, dated May 30, 2013 , within 30 days in written format with Proof of Service to the undersigned, constitutes and validates your fraud and failure to honor your Oath of Office. Furthermore, all said charges, judgments, warrants and/or claims against Jasmine Bolling, is null and void, without force or effect or lawful power. Any further harassment of Jasmine Bolling by this court or any of its officers will be construed as intentional harm, with malice and the conscious intent of inflicting both physical and mental harm to the defendant-in-error in this matter. Copies of this document along with the attached documents will be sent to the Office of Judicial Administrations, Washington DC in the event that justice is not reached. Respectfully submitted, All Rights Reserved ________________________________ John Doe, American Citizen CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 30 day of May 2013, a true and exact copy of the aforesaid Motion was sent, first class postage prepaid, by U.S. mail, to Justin W. Wayment, ESQ. and Honorable, Kenneth H. Adams, 51 East 400 North, PO Box 1808, Cedar City, Utah 84721. All Rights Reserved _________________________________ John Doe, American Citizen RECORDING REQUESTED BY, AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: NAME JOHN JAY, DOE STREET/BOX 134-15 166pl Apt 10c CITY Jamaica STATE New York (SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDERS USE ONLY) ================================================================================================================== Note: Use This To SHUT THEM DOWN! Get It Notarized & Authenticated IN THE COURT OF THE STATE OF _________ CASE #_________________ JUDGE _________________ FICTITIOUS FOREIGN STATE Vs Non corporate entity _________________ ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL OR STATE THE PROPER JURISDICTION ADMIMISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL OR STATE THE PROPER JURISDICTION Now comes____________________ a non corporate entity with an ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE ; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL OR STATE THE PROPER JURISDICTION. Pursuant to FRCP Rule 4 (j) This Court is defined under FRCP Rule 4 (j) as a FOREIGN STATE as defined under 28 USC 1602 -1611 FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY ACT (FSIA) is being jurisdictionally challenged and full disclosure of the true jurisdiction of this Court is now being demanded. Any failure to disclose the true jurisdiction is a violation of 15 Statutes at Large, Chapter 249 (section 1), enacted July 27 1868 Chap. CCXLIX. ---An Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign States Whereas the rights of expatriation is a nature and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; and whereas in the recognition of this principle this government has freely received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the right of citizenship; and whereas it is claimed that such American citizens, with their descendants, are subjects of foreign states, owing allegiance to the government thereof; and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed; Thereof. Be it enacted by the Senator and the House of Representatives of the United States of American in Congress assembled, That any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision, of any officers of is government which denies., restricts , impairs or questions the rights of expatriation , is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government. As an America Citizen I hold the inherent right of the 11th amendment. The judicial power shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted by a Foreign State. If this FOREIGN STATE is misusing the name of this America Citizen by placing it in all caps or misusing the last name or using the term “person” as a CORPORATION all complaints and suit against such CORPORATION fall under the FSIA and the DEPT OF STATE OFFICES in Washington DC. DC now has to be notify pursuant to 22 CFR 93.1 -93.2. A copy of the FSIA has to be filed with the complaint to the defendant’s chief executive officer of that CORPORATION. MUNICIPAL, COUNTY, OR STATE COURT lacks jurisdiction to hear any case under the FOREIGN STATE definitions. This jurisdiction lies with the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT under the FSIA Statutes pursuant to 28 USC 1330. Because the Defendant is a non corporate entity and is not registered with any Secretary of State as a CORPORATION the Prosecution has FAILED to state a claim to which relief can be granted under 12(b) (6). Therefore this matter must be dismissed for lack of political, personam, and subject matter jurisdiction, Venue and under the 11th amendment. Definitions Corpus Juris Secundum The Body of Law or Legal encyclopedia, Volume 7, Section 4: as quoted: Attorney & client: An Attorneys first duty is to the Courts (1st) and the public (2nd) and not to the client (3rd), and wherever the duties to an attorneys client conflict with those interests that he/she owes his allegiance to, as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter. The Biggest problem today is that People do not know their own rights & blindly entrust their rights to someone else. BLACK‘S LAW DICTIONARY FIFTH EDITION Foreign Court The courts of a foreign state or nation. In the United States, this term is frequently applied to the courts of one of the states when their judgment or records are introduced in the courts of another. Foreign jurisdiction Any jurisdiction foreign to that of the forum; e.g. a sister state or another country. Also the exercise by a state or nation jurisdiction beyond its own territory. Long - arm Service of process is a form of such foreign or extraterritorial jurisdiction Foreign laws The laws of a foreign country, or of a sister state. In conflict of law, the legal principle of jurisprudence which are part of the law of a sister state or nation. Foreign laws are additions to our own laws, and in that respect are called “jus receptum” Foreign corporation A corporation doing business in one state though chartered or incorporated in another state is a foreign corporation as to the first state, and, as such, is required to consent to certain conditions and restriction in order to do business in such first state. Under federal tax laws, a foreign corporation is one which is not organized under the law of one of the states or territories of the United States. I.R.C. § 7701 (a) (5). Service of process on foreign corporation is governed by the Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 See also Corporation TITLE 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE, Subtitle F - Procedure and Administration ,CHAPTER 79 – DEFINITIONS Sec. 7701. Definitions (5) Foreign The term foreign when applied to a corporation or partnership means a corporation or partnership which is not domestic. Foreign service of process Service of process for the acquisition of jurisdiction by a court in the United States upon a person in a foreign country is prescribed by Fed R. Civ. P. 4 (i) and 28 U.S.C.A. § 1608. Service of process on foreign corporation is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d) (3) Foreign states Nations which are outside the United States. Term may also refer to another state; i.e. a sister state. Foreign immunity With respect to jurisdiction immunity of foreign nation, see 28 U.S.C.A 1602 et seq. Profiteering Taking advantage of unusual or exceptional circumstance to make excessive profit; e.g. selling of scarce or essential goods at inflated price during time of emergency or war. Person In general usage, a human being (i.e. nature person) thought by statute term may include a firm, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, ,legal representative, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy ,or receivers. National Labor Relations act, §2(1). A corporation is a” person” within meaning of equal protection and due process provisions of United States Constitution. Writ of error coram nobis A common-law writ, the purpose of which is to correct a judgment in the same court in which it was rendered, on the ground of error of fact, for which it was statutes provides no other remedy, which fact did not appear of record, or was unknown to the court when judgment was pronounced, and which ,if known would have prevented the judgment, and which was unknown, and could of reasonable diligence in time to have been otherwise presented to the court, unless he was prevented from so presenting them by duress, fear, or other sufficient cause. At common law in England, it issued from the Court of Kings Bench to a judgment of that court. Its principal aim is to afford the court in which an action was tried and opportunity to correct it own record with reference to a vital fact not known when the judgment was rendered. It is also said that at common law it lay to correct purely ministerial errors of the officers of the court. _______________________[LS] PROOF OF SERVICE Now comes _______________ with a ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE; IN THE NATURE OF WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS & A DEMAND FOR DISMISSAL OR STATE THE PROPER JURISDICTION. To be placed before the Clerk of Court of_______________________________________________ and this day of __________________ and month of____________________in the year of our Lord 2008 AD __________________[LS] CC =========================================================================================================================================================== Note: Use This To SHUT DOWN The Attorney. You DO NOT NEED Them! Here is How You REVOKE A Court Ordered Attorney. Get It Notarized And Authenticated REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY Furthermore, I hereby revoke, rescind, and make void ab initio, all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it pertains to the Social Security number assigned to me, _______________________ as it pertains to my birth certificate, marriage or business license, or any other licenses or certificates issued by any and all government or quasi-governmental entities, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt to deprive me of my Sovereignty and/or property. I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged benefit or gratuity associated with any of the aforementioned licenses, numbers, or certificates. I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it pertains to any and all property, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole and absolute legal owner and possess allodial title to any and all such property. Take Notice that I also revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio all powers of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all quasi/colorable, public, governmental entities or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent facts. I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct. I affirm that I am of lawful age and am competent to make this Affidavit. I hereby affix my own signature to all of the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation of all my unalienable rights and my specific common law right not to be bound by any contract or obligation which I have not entered into knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion. The use of notary below is for identification only, and such use does NOT grant any jurisdiction to anyone. FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT. Subscribed and sworn, without prejudice, and with all rights reserved, John Doe, Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris. My Hand and Mark as Subscriber Date: May 31, 2013 Common Law Seal:__________________________________ On this __31st____day of___MAY_________, 2013____, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for _______________________(state), personally appeared the above-signed, known to me to be the one whose name is signed on this instrument, and has acknowledged to me that s/he has executed the same. Signed:_________________________________________ Printed Name:____________________________________ Date:___________________________________________ My Commission Expires:____________________________ Notice is under the jurisdiction of the American Flag of Peace of the united States of America. I, «FirstName» «MiddleName», «LastName», am at Peace with my government. No flag of war shall be allowed affect upon my lawful name or character. I, «FirstName» «MiddleName», «LastName», have entered no contract to waive any of my rights or assent to transact any right transfer away from my natural born American National Character (or same as adopted by oath). «FirstName» «MiddleName», «LastName» Non-Bankrupt c/o United States Post Office «JudicialDist» Judicial District, The State of «State» Non Domestic Mail «AffiantAddress» «City», «State» USA «PostalCode» A SECURITY - 15 USC -------------------------------- THIS IS A U.S.S.E.C. TRACER FLAG, NOT A POINT OF LAW* *See attached EXPLANATION SHEET ======================================================================== EXPLANATION SHEET TO BE ATTACHED TO EVERY COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENT OR FILING TO BE ATTACHED TO EVERY COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENT CONTAINING THE PHRASE A SECURITY - 15 USC This EXPLANATION SHEET is to be attached to all Commercial Affidavits, including Affidavits of Obligation (Commercial Liens), which are non-judicial consensual processes which arise out of breach of special performance, e.g. for public officials breach of oath of office, a violation of the Constitution for the United States of America (1787). The Notice is included for the purposes of Full Disclosure (UCC), and as a warning for Commercial grace. The reference to Title 15 on a Commercial Affidavit is to indicate that the Affidavit could become a U.S.S.E.C. Federal Security with tracking number. A SECURITY - 15 USC ------------------------------- THIS IS A U.S.S.E.C. TRACER FLAG, NOT A POINT OF LAW* *One definition of A SECURITY is any evidence of debt. The Lien Claimant does NOT rely on Title 15 USC as a basis for the Commercial Lien. All commercial processes, by using or relying on notes or paper in Commerce (e.g. Federal Reserve Notes), must bear some sort of Federal tracking, a County Recorders number, or a serial number, which process must be accessible for inspection at the nearest relevant County Recorders Office or be widely advertised. When a Lien matures in three (3) months by default of the Lien Debtor through the Lien Debtors failure to rebut the affidavit of obligation point-for-point categorically, it becomes an accounts receivable in the ordinary sense of a collectible debt upon which assignments, collateralization, and other Commercial transactions can be based, hence it becomes a Security subject to observation, tracking, and regulation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter U.S.S.E.C.). The notation A Security - 15 USC Is a flag in Commerce telling the U.S.S.E.C. that a speculation account is being established to enforce the lien. The U.S.S.E.C. can then monitor the process. As long as the process is truthful, open, and above board (full disclosure), the U.S.S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over it, for even the U.S.S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over the truth of testimony, depositions, affidavits, and affidavits of obligation (Commercial Liens), and an unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce. Legal Authority: Universal moral/existential truths/principles, expressed in Judaic (Mosaic) Orthodox Hebrew/Jewish Commercial Code, corollary to Exodus (chiefly Exodus 20:15,16). This is the best known Commercial process in America. Its prime user is the Internal Revenue Service. The IRS uses all three tracking codes. The federal code is the taxpayers IRS document file number. The next stronger code is the County Recorders number. The strongest, most important, most universal code is the taxpayers identification number (TIN), also known as the Social Security Number (SSN). The IRS collection process is legitimate. The IRS assessment process, however, is a Commercial fraud. IRS collection is not supported by any Commercial Affidavits, Commercial Liens, or by any contracts, agreements, or True Bill in Commerce establishing the basis on which any debt can be collected. An affidavit is someones solemn expression of truth. The foundation of the law, Commerce, and the whole legal system consists of telling the truth (I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. . .) either by testimony, deposition, and/or by affidavit. Every honorable judge requires those who appear before him to be sworn to tell the truth, and is compelled by the high principles of his profession to protect truth and do nothing to tamper with that truth, either directly or indirectly, in person or by proxy, or by subordination of an affiant or other party. A judge cannot interfere with, tamper with, or in any way modify testimony without disintegrating the truth-seeking process in his sacred profession and destroying the fabric of his own occupation. To do so abrogates the 1st Amendment, which was established to protect truth. Doing so is committing professional suicide, as well as inviting countless civil and criminal repercussions. Any judge who tampers with testimony, deposition, or affidavit, is a threat to the Commercial Peace and Dignity of the County, State, and United States of America, thereby violating the laws of all those political subdivisions and acting in the nature of a foreign, enemy Agent (a Mixed War), justifiably subject to penalties of treason. Whoever acts against Commercial Affidavits without executing the necessary Commercial Paperwork under affidavit is subject to being charged criminally. Said charges include fraud, which is gaining at the expense of the loss of another using trickery or deception, and expand to include all violations that issue from said fraud. Commercial processes are fundamentally non-judicial and pre-judicial. No judge, court, law, or government can invalidate these Commercial processes, i.e. an affidavit or a lien or complaint based thereon, because no third party can invalidate someones affidavit of truth. To act against such an affidavit is to create a situation and/or enhance the condition of a Mixed War. No one can rebut an affiant except a party (e.g. a lien debtor) who alone, by his own affidavit, must speak for himself or herself if challenged. Only someone himself or herself knows his or her truth and has the right and responsibility to assert it. A Mixed War condition exists where authorities have violated their oaths of office, violated the fundamental law they swore to uphold and protect, violated the codes, statutes, and regulations that govern them and in so doing disregard the peace and safety of the community by their acts, operating as Agents for undisclosed Foreign Principals or Governments against those whom they swore to protect. Such acts of Treason constitute a secret war against the people. When an Affidavit is flagged in Commerce it becomes a Federal Document because it could become translated into a Security (for example by being attached in support of a Commercial Lien), and not accepting and/or filing a Commercial Affidavit becomes a Federal offense.
Posted on: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 17:51:51 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015