The missing Malaysian Air Lines plane is interesting for a lot of reasons, most of them having to do with applications of technology. I am quite sure that, given all the available information, I could do a lot better than the published results, mostly because of simple geometry and related factors (e.g., amplitude) related to communications. There are other potential sources of locational information, including the many cell phones on the plane that have very pointedly not been mentioned. What it does strongly imply, perhaps indicate, is the involvement of someone or a group of technologically sophisticated people. In a very real sense, this whole thing is more than a little similar to one of the old James Bond movies, about a nuclear-armed British airplane that was diverted to the Caribbean. Actually, it is quite possible that the James Bond movie was the basis for this event. The very idea that several major nations did not have this aircraft on its radar (and recorded same) is both absurd and preposterous! Oh, Im not talking about the ordinary line-of-sight radar that tracks aircraft (but am not ruling-it-out, either!), but the many strategic Over-The-Horizon (OTH) Radar Systems employed routinely by many nations around the Earth, specifically including China, Russia and Viet Nam. Yes, the USA (with its allies) has several OTH Radar Systems, too, positioned in many countries. Such OTH Radar Systems can commonly cover a radius of 2,000-5,000 miles, depending upon the time of day and properties of the radar. Adding to the absurdity of the situation is the existence of many space-based radar systems, some of which have and are being used to image over the oceans. Most of these radar systems are based on the RORSAT System first developed by the Russians in the 1960s and copied and improved(?) by a variety of other nations, in particular by the USAs SeaSAT. While Caltechs Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) took full credit for developing SeaSAT, in actual fact, SeaSAT was clearly a sophisticated copy or attempt to replicate the Russian RORSAT! By the way, JPL, like other university-owned 501C3 labs is not truly part of NASA, but only a contractor: in fact, JPL enjoys far larger contracts from the DOD than from NASA and always has. With this as the simple and clear technological reality, I am wondering what will eventually be disclosed. So far, we have seen only Red Herrings! Yes, this is very interesting, indeed. What is really going on here?
Posted on: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 07:05:09 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015