This argument becomes even more compelling when we consider the Pluto-Charon system. Charon does not orbit Pluto either like the Moon orbits Earth or like Oberon orbits Uranus. Charon orbits Pluto around its poles in a direction pointing ‘towards’ the Sun (Fig. 1 - Scenario C)! Like Uranus, Pluto spins around its poles, but unlike Uranus, Pluto does so in the direction of the Sun. By strange coincidence Charon also orbits Pluto in this direction and more coincidental yet, at the same speed that Pluto spins on its axis! Charon has a synchronous orbit around its primary, which clearly indicates that its orbit depends on the rotation of Pluto rather than on the static warped space mechanism proposed by Einstein. Indeed, with few exceptions involving captured asteroids, all satellites in the Solar System orbit their primaries along their equators (all of which are tilted with respect to the ecliptic) and in the direction in which the primary spins. These facts refute the relativity theory that geometry is responsible for the motion of planets around the Sun. The space-time canvas analogy used by Einstein to explain the orbit of Mercury is simply dead wrong! The gullible morons of Mathematical Physics are staring at an inexistent robe.
Posted on: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:30:52 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015