To strengthen these efforts, the preparation needs to be done either through the established rules of the Regulation of the Minister of Planning / Head of Bappenas, the Joint Circular of the Ministry of Planning / Bappenas with relevant agencies, as well as in other forms of written commitment between the Ministry of Planning / Bappenas with the relevant agencies. Various rules that need to be drawn are: • Guidelines for Preparation of Strategic Plan for Ministry / Agency • Guidelines for Government Work Plan; • Guidelines for Development Planning Meeting; and • Institutional Relations agency planning and budgeting institutions. 3) Policy Alternatives III: Procedure Rules Remain As Current Regulation, But Need To Repair Formulation Harmonization and Substance Regulations In this alternative, which consists of grammar rules of Law No. 17 of 2003, Act No. 25 of 2004 and Act No. 32 of 2004 along with the rules of implementation remain. It just needs to be harmonization of the rules relating to development planning and budgeting by making improvements over substance conflicting rules and perfecting a formula that is not clear substance and cause multiple interpretations. 4) Alternative Policy IV: Regulation Simpilifikasi with Publish The New Law is Being Umbrella Regulation in the Field Development Planning and Budgeting As explained above that the rules governing the development planning and budgeting so much and of which there is a conflict between the rules. In addition, there are many rules that are not clear formulation and multiple interpretations. The impact of that is the rule becomes effective that development planning and budgeting are not synergistic. Therefore, to improve the conditions simplify the authors suggest issuing Act which became an umbrella all regulations in the field of development planning and budgeting. In this position, all of the Law relating to budgeting including the State Budget Act shall be made by the Act. When this is done, the Act may replace the Guidelines of State Policy (Guidelines). In the Act could be included include new substances • strengthening the role of institutions in national and regional planning; • load rule sanctions (administrative) for those who do not obey the rules of the Act; • eliminating rules in Law Number 42 Year 2008 concerning the election of the President and Vice President who stated that the Presidential Candidate / Vice President shall communicate the vision of the campaign, as well as the rules in the Act No. 25 of 2004 which states that lays RPJMN Vision President / Vice President elected. • set planning models are not rigid and more responsive to the changing strategic environment (scenario planning). a. Assessment of policy alternatives RIA method next step is to assess various policy alternatives that have been determined using an analysis of benefits and costs (cost & benefit analysis). In this study the cost and benefit analysis that is used is very simple to consider the benefits and costs of each policy alternative. To be able to compare each policy alternative, it is necessary to first set the following assessment variables: 1) Benefits. Variable benefit selected based on development goals to be achieved to solve the problem, which is a clear governance rules and do not overlap; formulate a clear substance that contains the norms and rules and sanctions are not opposed to each other; and the presence of organs which continue to oversee the effectiveness of its implementation either through enforcement or regulatory implementation socialization. In terms of benefits, assessment variables used are as follows: • the rule of law and the absence of overlap between the regulatory • substance synergy between planning documents, both national and regional development • substance synergy between development planning and budgeting the role of the Ministry of Planning / Bappenas in synergy coordinating development planning and budgeting 2) Cost. Variable costs are the development of the indicators used in a production process inputs to produce an output. In terms of costs, the assessment variables used are as follows: • funding is needed, either the funds needed to bring alternative policies and to implement the policy; • the time required to realize the policy alternatives • human resources required, both human resources required to realize the policy alternatives and to implement the policy; and • Other efforts are needed, both diperlukankan efforts to realize the policy alternatives and to implement the policy. Each variable will be scored with a number ranging from 0 to 10 This figure represents the following matters: Table 29 Variables and Assessment Scores variables Score BENEFITS rule of law and the absence of overlap between the regulatory • Jika no legal certainty and there is a lot of overlap between the scores given rule is 0. • Jika lack of legal certainty and there are some rules that overlap is then given a score of 1-3. • Jika enough legal certainty and there are little rules that overlap is then given a score of 4-6. • Jika legal certainty created properly and there are no overlapping rules, the score given is 7-10. substance synergy between development plan documents • Jika no substance synergy between development plan documents, then the score given was 0. • there is less Jika sinergitaa substance between the development plan document is given a score of 1-3. • Jika enough substance there is synergy between the development plan document is given a score of 4-6. • Jika substance synergy between development planning documents so good then the score given is 7-10. substance synergy between development planning and budgeting • Jika no substance synergy between development planning and budgeting, the score given was 0. • Jika less substance there is synergy between development planning and budgeting, the score given is 1-3. • Jika enough substance there is synergy between development planning and budgeting is then given a score of 4-6. • Jika substance synergy between pembangvunan planning and budgeting documents so good then the score given is 7-10. the role of the Ministry of Planning / Bappenas in synergy coordinate planning and budgeting • Jika no role of the Ministry of Planning / Bappenas in synergy coordinating development planning and budgeting, the score given was 0. • Jika role of the Ministry of Planning / Bappenas in synergy coordinating development planning and budgeting less then the score given was 1-3. • Jika role of the Ministry of Planning / Bappenas in synergy coordinating development planning and budgeting enough then given a score is 4-6. • Jika role of the Ministry of Planning / Bappenas in coordinating development planning and budgeting synergy stronger then the score given is 7-10. COST funds needed • Jika no funds are needed, the score given was 0. • Jika funds needed bit of the score given was 1-3. • Jika huge funds required is then given a score of 4-6. • Jika enormous funds needed then the score given is 7-10. time required • Jika no time is required then the score given was 0. • Jika time it takes a minute then given a score is 1-3. • Jika long time required is then given a score of 4-6. • Jika takes a very long time, the score given is 7-10. Human resources required • Jika no human resources required, the score given was 0. • Jika human resources required are small, the score given is 1-3. • Jika much human resources required is then given a score of 4-6. • HR Jika very much needed given the score is 7-10 Another effort required • Jika no other attempts are required then the score given was 0. • Jika there is little effort required other then the score given was 1-3. • Jika no other effort required is then given a score of 4-6. • Jika there are many other measures are required then the score given is 7-10. Source: Data processed Taking into account variables such as the above assessment, the assessment process following each policy alternative: 1) Policy Alternative I: Do Nothing (Not Doing What What) Table 30 Alternative Assessment Policy 1 BENEFIT Variable • kepastian hukum dan tidak adanya tumpang tindih antar peraturan • Sinergitas substansi antar dokumen perencanaan pembangunan • Sinergitas substansi antara dokumen perencanaan pembangunan dan penganggaran • peran Kementerian PPN/Bappenas dalam mengkoordinasikan • Sinergitas perencanaan pembangunan dan penganggaran explanation • There is overlap between the rules so that no clear legal certainty • Synergy between RKP and RPJMN and RPJPN can be accomplished, however, appear non SPPN other planning documents (MP3I and various RAN). The synergy between the RKP with working plan still has not happened, as well as the synergy between central and local planning documents has not occurred • There is no synergy between development planning and budgeting as well as the results of the analysis in the previous focus • Existing regulations have provided space for ministry • Planning / Bappenas to coordinate development planning, but they have a space for the development mensinergikanperencanaan budgeting COST variable • funds needed • The time required • Human resources required explanation • Funds are necessary to implement this policy alternatives no • However, the cost required to implement existing regulations mandated one things (musrenbang, etc.) • The time required to implement there is no alternative policy • However, the time required to carry out a variety of things that mandated the existing regulations (musrenbang, etc.) • human resources required to implement this policy alternatives no • However, the necessary human resources to implement the existing regulations mandated (musrenbang, etc.) Source: Data processed Based on the above-mentioned table, it can be seen that the cost required is greater than the benefits provided (8 minus 12 equals -4) 2) Policy Alternatives II: Construction Current Regulations As Fixed, But Need to Conduct Quality Improvement Efforts Development Planning and Budgeting Table 31 Policy Alternative Assessment II BENEFIT variable • rule of law and the absence of overlap between the regulatory • Substance synergy between development plan documents • Substance synergy between development planning and budgeting Explanation Synergy between RKP and RPJMN and RPJPN can successful, but thus appears planning documents Another non SPPN (MP3I and various RAN). Synergy between RKP with Renja can maintained through guidelines for the preparation of Renja set through Regulation Minister of Planning / Head Bappenas. synergy documents planning development and strip centers can maintained through funds deconcentration, quarterly meeting, assistance and etc. synergy between planning development and budgeting on central level can maintained through trilateral meeting. synergy planning and budgeting more can be maintained when Ministry Planning / Bappenas able to ake guidelines for regional synergize planning development and budgeting Existing regulations has rovided space for ministry Planning / Bappenas for coordinate planning development, but by issuing various guidelines and perform various efforts facilitating the preparation of planning development and budget, including deconcentration fund role of the Ministry Planning / Bappenas will more isible on the surface and apparent existence COST variable • funds needed • The time required • Human resources required Explanation required time to implement various things that mandated regulations existing (musrenbang, etc.). required time to implement various efforts improve the quality of planning development and penganganggaran (trilateral meeting, quarterly meeting, fund deconcentration, Rule-making Minister of Planning / Head Bappenas, assistance • Required HR to implement various things that mandated existing regulations (musrenbang, etc.). • Required HR to implement various efforts increase quality planning development and penganganggaran (trilateral meeting, quarterly meetings, deconcentration funds, manufacture Regulation of the Minister VAT / Head Bappenas, assistance etc.) Need to do a pattern good communication and fostering relationship with Ministry of Finance and Kemendagri Source: Data processed Based on the above-mentioned table, it can be seen that the benefits provided is greater than the cost required (21 minus 17 equals 4) 3) Policy Alternatives III: Procedure Rules Remain As Current Regulation, But Need To Repair Formulation Harmonization and Substance Regulations Table 32 Policy Alternatives Assessment III BENEFIT Variable • rule of law and the absence of overlap between the regulatory • Substance synergy between development plan documents • Substance synergy between development planning and budgeting role of the Ministry • Planning / Bappenas in coordinate synergy planning development and budgeting Explanation • Overlap between regulation can repaired. yet because the rules are still apart on many regulations, possibility of rules are still still overlap can occur. • More legal certainty well, the rules which clearly can not corrected the synergy between Working plan, RKP and RPJMN and RPJPN can accomplished. • various documents other planning non SPPN (MP3I and various RAN) get legality is certain and ecome part of the system development planning so that synergy can be maintained. • synergy documents planning development centers and strip can be maintained through rules better. • synergy planning and better budgeting better regulation created through a clearer • The role of the Ministry / Bappenas will be stronger if the legality of the substance perbahan regulation can enter into the regulatory role COST Variable • funds needed • The time required • Human resources required Explanation ecessary costs to implement various things that mandated existing regulations (musrenbang, etc.). • Necessary costs to improve regulation (discussion of the Act, PP) required time to implement various things that mandated regulations existing (musrenbang, etc.). required time To improve the regulation (UU discussion, PP) • Required HR to implement various things that mandated existing regulations (musrenbang, etc.). • Required HR to improve regulation (UU discussion, PP) There needs to be a strong commitment from kementetian / Bappenas, Ministry of Finance, and Ministry of Home Affairs to improve Act 25/2004, 17/2003, Law 32/2004 There needs to be good communication between the three ministries so that there is no overlap between the new Act Source: Data processed Based on the above-mentioned table, it can be seen that the benefits provided is greater than the cost required (27 minus 26 equals 1). 4) Alternative Policy IV: Simplification Regulations by Act One Publishes New Regulations Being Umbrella in Field Development Planning and Budgeting.
Posted on: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 00:43:28 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015