W. James on options (The Will To Believe): Let us give the name of hypothesis to anything that may be proposed to our belief; and just as the electricians speak of live and dead wires, let us speak of any hypothesis as either live or dead. A live hypothesis is one which appeals as a real possibility to him to whom it is proposed. If I ask you to believe in the Mahdi, the notion makes no electric connection with your nature— it refuses to scintillate with any credibility at all. As an hypothesis it is completely dead. To an Arab, however (even if he be not one of the Mah- di’s followers), the hypothesis is among the mind’s possibilities: It is alive. This shows that deadness and liveness in an hypothesis are not intrinsic properties, but relations to the individual thinker. They are measured by his willingness to act. The maximum of liveness in an hypothesis means willingness to act irrevocably. Practi- cally, that means belief; but there is some believing tendency wherever there is willingness to act at all. Next, let us call the decision between two hypotheses an option. Options may be of several kinds. They may be first, living or dead; secondly, forced or avoidable; thirdly, momentous or trivial; and for our purposes we may call an option a gen- uine option when it is of a forced, living, and momentous kind. 1. A living option is one in which both hypotheses are live ones. If I say to you: ‘‘Be a theosophist or be a Mohammedan,’’ it is probably a dead option, because for you neither hypothesis is likely to be alive. But if I say: ‘‘Be an agnostic or be a Christian,’’ it is otherwise: trained as you are, each hypothesis makes some appeal, however small, to your belief. 2. Next, if I say to you: ‘‘Choose between going out with your umbrella or without it,’’ I do not offer you a genuine option, for it is not forced. You can easily avoid it by not going out at all. Similarly, if I say, ‘‘Either love me or hate me,’’ ‘‘Either call my theory true or call it false,’’ your option is avoidable. You may remain indifferent to me, neither loving nor hating, and you may decline to offer any judgment as to my theory. But if I say, ‘‘Either accept this truth or go with- out it,’’ I put on you a forced option, for there is no standing place outside of the alternative. Every dilemma based on a complete logical disjunction, with no possibility of not choosing, is an option of this forced kind. 3. Finally, if I were Dr. Nansen and proposed to you to join my North Pole expedition, your option would be momentous; for this would probably be your similar opportunity, and your choice now would either exclude you from the North Pole sort of immortality altogether or put at least the chance of it into your hands. He who refuses to embrace a unique opportunity loses the prize as surely as if he tried and failed. Per contra, the option is trivial when the opportunity is not unique, when the stake is insig- nificant, or when the decision is reversible if it later proves unwise. Such trivial options abound in the scientific life. A chemist finds an hypothesis live enough to spend a year in its verification: he believes in it to that extent. But if his experiments prove inconclusive either way, he is quit for his loss of time, no vital harm being done.
Posted on: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:58:30 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015