Whisper Words of Wisdom By deploying expeditionary military forces in to Ukraine the Russian government is introducing a new Security Strategy Concept of distinctive partner relations with CIS states.This is designed to implement if required ammendments to the foreign, security and neighbour policy so that to use excuse mechanism whenever referring to membership.This mechanism is intended to remove a situation of great uncertainty for the West. For many Russian nationalists emergence of independent states within the former Soviet space with inherited political instability, absence of a clear interest, difficulty of selfdefending militarily is another reality of lost chances. Generally incursion of Russian expeditionary military contingent is a showcase to urge EU loyalists including those minor sceptics to stop defending Ukraine militarily. Given the uncertainty of the current situation within Ukraine, it is critical we understand how the military nationalists are attempting to articulate the capabilities of the force structure. Todays Russian military and security leadership relies largely on military thought of Soviet preventive defense strategy which is believed to be ideologically sustainable, has the enduring principles with no any reference to cession. In combination with political fundamentals it is a playbook of selfpreservation in world close environment. Indeed it defines the underlying threats to the Russian state and how the force structure should be comprised. Since late last decade Russian nationalist leaders were attempting to implement a Monroe Doctrine concept. At the same time more stress is set on the role of nuclear forces in regional conflicts. It is believed a contract between the government and the military to turn former republics into turmoil for safer empire. Eastern Europe used to be serving as a buffer zone to secure wartime conquests. A network of military arm sales and advisors to project political influence was establised in the Third World. Some of emerging nations are chosen to become buffer states with inherited political instability, absence of a clear interest, difficulty of selfdefending militarily. This term would be collectively agreed upon too in diplomacy talks to stop crisis in east Ukraine. Low-intensity conflicts are viewed by Soviets as the most probable type of warfare. Unlike large-scale conventional wars a low intensity conflict bears no enduring consequencies, it can be ceased quickly and has a good chance to negotiate on favorable conditions. In 1984 former Chief of the Soviet General Staff stressed on a sharp expansion in the zone of possible combat operations during the initial period of war. It is an attempt to bring Ukraines status back to 20 Feb 2014, consolidate presence in occupied territories and to negotiate current sanctions.Russia is keen to advance along Azov seashore by making it Baikal alike lake). By that time isurgency would be in hury to expand throughout Donbass pocket as wide as possible. Immediately after Azov seashore passage is cleared international community would receive an urgent call to stop conflict and to negotiate peace mission area. Yanukovych-Putins national security strategy for Ukraine as a non-aligned state should not object Ukraines sovereignty right of defending militarily. Otherwise it is departure from the original purpose of the Alliance itself. New dividing lines has emerged and led to sacrifice of one for the other. Ethnic, territorial, and economic disputes tend to spill over ever standing borders and frontiers.
Posted on: Wed, 03 Sep 2014 13:04:20 +0000