Why is the revelation of a sons right to the safety of his mother, given the fact that he had already witnessed the tragic deaths of his father and grandmother, fodder for controversy/treated like Pandoras box exploding? Political repercussions outta the window, please. Statements like think of the party, the country when one is part of a family whose members have been gruesomely put down somehow dont make sense to affected children. So what if Rahul resisted?
Posted on: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 15:02:24 +0000
Trending Topics
Recently Viewed Topics
© 2015