https://youtube/watch?v=tWMv6VHaiBs “No state agent shall … make any … Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts ….” “It is essential to the existence of a labor contract that there be: 1. A lawful object; and 2. A sufficient … consideration.” A key case on “sufficient consideration” for labor time contracts explains the rule: At work, “Each … customer is served by a customer service team, rather than by an individual employee.” … To calculate the weekly … distribution, the selected counting employee must: (1) determine the total monetary amount from the … container; (2) calculate the total number of hours worked by all … in the particular store; (3) divide the total amount of hours by the stores total earned … for the week to obtain the business tip-revenue hourly rate; (4) multiply each of the … hours by the tip hourly rate to determine each employees tip income; and (5) place each employees … income in a sealed envelope, label the envelope with the employees name, and store the envelope in the safe until the employee is available to take possession of it. “All persons are capable of contracting, except … persons deprived of civil rights.” Persons deprived of the above “obligation of labor contracts” are those classified as “The Working Horse”, owned or rented, under the U.C.C.’s body of contracts as opposed to Constitutional Article III Common Law of Contracts. The UCC is Amistad like Contract Law – it is The State Bar and Legislature’s Sales Law, U.C.C. Article 2: •For a person: a name-heading spelled in all capital letters …. •For a person: language … in larger … or in contrasting type …. Full Citizenship USA’s Constitution, Article I, section 10, clause 1. California Civil Code § 1550. Chau v. Starbucks, Inc., 174 Cal.App.4th 688 (2009). Chau v. Starbucks, Inc., 174 Cal.App.4th 688, at page 693 (2009). California Civil Code § 1556. Schooner Amistad, 40 U.S. 518 (1841). UCC, Article 2, section (1)(b)(i)(A). UCC, Article 2, section (1)(b)(i)(B).
Posted on: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 06:24:30 +0000