...if youll have us.* ...STEVEN SPIELBERG got it wrong! READ THIS - TopicsExpress



          

...if youll have us.* ...STEVEN SPIELBERG got it wrong! READ THIS CAREFULLY. THE TRUE EXECUTOR is not a secret gnostic who pretends to have powers over you/US to interpret in a light most favorable to their own already ruling, as the intoxicated one, in this cine. And, AND the TRUE JUDGE, KNOWS THE DOCkit IS THE DOMAIN OF THE JUDGE. ASK, N.O.W.; TO WHOM SHOULD I, one, THE TRUE ELECT, RICHARD CHARLES NORTON, (Seer Rees,) abdicate any responsibility for final, dispositive JUDGMENTS? THEYre ALL WHORES! Most all confuse a scale of judgments to exit a court with potential indulgences, associated with such; as opposed to a TRUE scale of JUSTICE, to ENTER a court, into T.H.I.S.; and potential mercy, associated with such. THE BOOKS HAVE TO BE OPEN to use a TRUE SCALE OF JUSTICE AND ANY POTENTIAL MERCY, associated with such. ANALYZE THIS. youtube/watch?v=K5lQA3bipHc --- Justice is the Fulfillment of Ones Responsibilities and Privileges So many, while reading this article will desire to better attempt to define their expectations. This is done to better address their wills or compulsions. This will ultimately force one to question the meaning of “justice.” If one were to question 100 attorneys as to what the meaning of justice is, there would probably follow over a 100 different answers. Most of the definitions from the attorneys most closely resemble Thrassimacus’ definition; “…whatever those in power define it as.” Plato, in his writing, “Republic,” dedicates his first chapter to Justice. An interesting (fictional?) dialogue between his mentor, Socrates, and Thrassimacus is contained within that first and most important chapter, “Justice.” Our wills, or compulsions, (or if we have an OCD, our addictions) to perceive ourselves as something other than that which we are, often result in us owning Thrassimacus’ horrendous [but most popularly accepted] definition. This often forces us to improperly rationalize our actions. This creates “two realities” in our minds. Our OCD directs us to extend our wills to [improperly] control that which is not ours to control. From these two (or more) realities another phenomenon, results—cognitive, emotive dissonance. I will leave the subject of “cognitive, emotive dissonance” to others in the psychological specialties to address. Suffice it to say, it is when everything starts getting messed up from multiple wrong paradigms and perspectives. This is actually the experience in which most of us truly live. Thus, we not only wrestle in our experiences of two (or more) pasts, but two (or more) presents and two (or more) futures. Now we know that in any field of expertise, one is granted a certificate with “the privileges and responsibilities thereof.” When we manage our wills or compulsions to limiting the fulfillment of our own privileges and responsibilities, we all are just--we have but one reality. In good faith, we will be able to explain our responsible responses, when under stressed circumstances, we are compelled to extend our privileges in order to address an unusual responsibility. Life is full of those. Address them with humility. Humility is most the important intrinsic force in our lives. Humility is the arbitrating energy that reconciles justice with mercy--for others, and our selves. We are all temporal creatures that experience challenges and failures. Without humility, we live lives filled with denials and cognitive emotive dissonance. Without humility, we are confused and burdened with multiple pasts, presents and futures and are ultimately in denial of our addictions and false realities. Humility reminds us that our ultimate goal is to be servants to one another--to support their value and worth. Our suffering servant, reminded his closest followers of this constantly. His last example, prior to last full measure of his sacrifice, was to wash his students feet! How much more can this example be witnessed of combining the fulfillment of ones privileges and responsibilities in a humble manner than when parents deny themselves their own rewards in order to reward their children? I am reminded of a story shared with me by a gentleman who recounted, years before, his own experience adopting his daughter. His wife and he could not produce a child and had set out to the big city of Knoxville, TN, hours away, to finally see the four year old girl they had read about in a profile. This crusty old coal mine owner and truck salvage man then relayed to me how, after driving several hours on a two lane road; upon arrival, they were told to just sit and watch her play for a time prior to their personal introduction. After about thirty-minutes, the social worker asked if they were then ready to personally meet and went to bring the sweet little girl over to be introduced. After about another thirty-minutes, the new parents-to-be looked over at each other and nodded to acknowledge their positive decision. The social worker noticed and without summons, came to tell the little girl that she would need to come with her to get some things in order to stay with her new older friends and took her away. About that time, a slightly older boy, previously playing with the little girl; came up and asked if they were there to adopt Sally? They replied in the affirmative and the little boy looked down for a moment. He then looked up with teary eyes; Mister, thats my sister. Would you consider adopting me too? * A gulp, a glance to his wife, an affirming nod from her and he shared--Yes son, were going to adopt you too; if youll have us. --from the New Model of Addiction This new model of addiction was first introduced during a $5.2B OxyContin/Purdue Pharma class action suit. It prevailed in this suit, and has become the legal and scientific standard. This model argues that addiction is a manifestation of an Obsessive Compulsive disorder. Subsequent to its introduction, a political/legal controversy has resulted in Washington D.C. regarding what should be done to promote this new model within the healthcare system and what to do with the official history of its author--Dr. Norton.
Posted on: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 11:38:19 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015