*sigh* Theres a huge difference between admitting theres NO - TopicsExpress



          

*sigh* Theres a huge difference between admitting theres NO scientific evidence for their advocacy and stating, clearly, that this specific formula hasnt undergone these tests but its efficacy is based upon the base knowledge of how immunology works and past experience. We know this about flu vaccines. We anticipate, react fast, and hope they get the job done, and that methods pretty effective. But if we took the time to test everyone to the level necessary to remove that warning, the flu season would be OVER. Also, not exactly well-hidden if its written RIGHT on the official material.
Posted on: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:53:55 +0000

Trending Topics



Recently Viewed Topics




© 2015